AGENDA

Finance and Performance Committee

Late Item

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Susan Baty (Chairperson)

Jim Jefferies (Deputy Chairperson)

Grant Smith (The Mayor)

Adrian Broad

Leonie Hapeta

Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke

Lorna Johnson

Vaughan Dennison

Karen Naylor

Lew Findlay QSM

Bruno Petrenas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

 

 

 

Finance and Performance Committee MEETING

 

19 March 2018

 

LATE ITEMS

  

Consideration of the items is subject to the provisions of the urgent item clause, pursuant to Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

The Chairperson recommends that the items be considered as:

-         The items were not available at the time the Agenda was circulated; and

-        Consideration of the items is a matter of urgency, requiring a decision without delay to enable the Council to meet deadlines, finaslise decisions and receive information within agreed timeframes.

 

16.       Fees and Charges Review                                                                                   Page 5

Report, dated 15 March 2018 from the Strategy Manager Finance, Steve Paterson.    

     



 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

Report

TO:                                Finance and Performance Committee

MEETING DATE:           19 March 2018

TITLE:                            Fees and Charges Review

DATE:                            15 March 2018

AUTHOR/S:                   Steve Paterson, Strategy Manager Finance, City Corporate

 

 

RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Council

1.   That the report be received and the current status of fees and charges be noted.

Planning & Miscellaneous

2.   That the Statement of Proposal (and the associated summary) to adopt updated fees and charges for Planning Services and Miscellaneous Services effective from 1 July 2018 as attached in Appendix 2, be approved for public consultation and the Chief Executive be authorised to undertake the necessary consultative process under sections 83 and 150 of the Local Government Act 2002.

Building

3.   That the fees and charges for Building Services, as proposed in Appendix 3 be adopted and following public notification take effect from 9 April 2018.

Environmental Health

4.   That the fees and charges for Environmental Health Services (in terms of regulation 7 of the Health (Registration of Premises) Regulations 1966 and regulation 83 of the Food Hygiene Regulations 1974) as proposed in Appendix 4, be adopted and following public notification, take effect from 1 July 2018.

Animal Control

5.   That the fees and charges for the Impounding of Animals (in terms of section 14 of the Impounding Act 1955) and for Dog Registration and Dog Impounding (in terms of section 37 of the Dog Control Act 1996) as proposed in Appendix 5 be adopted, and once following public notification, take effect from 1 July 2018.

Burial & Cremation

6.   That the fees and charges for Burial and Cremation, as proposed in Appendix 6 be adopted and following public notification take effect from 1 July 2018.

 

Service Connections

7.   That the fees and charges for Service Connections, as proposed in Appendix 7 be adopted and take effect from 1 July 2018.

E-Waste Charges

8.   That the fees and charges for e-waste disposal as proposed in Appendix 8 be adopted and take effect from 1 July 2018.

Event Recycling Fees

9.   That the fees and charges for event recycling as proposed in Appendix 8 be adopted and take effect immediately.

 

 

 


 

Summary of options analysis for

Problem or Opportunity

Fees and charges need to be reviewed annually to ensure they adequately meet Revenue & Financing policy, budgetary and other objectives

OPTION 1:

Approve fee increases as proposed

Community Views

Each of different types of fees requires a different process for community engagement.  Where this is legislatively controlled it is identified in the report

Benefits

More likely to comply with funding proportions contained in Revenue & Financing Policy

Risks

Public criticism of increases

Increased charges for some activities may discourage compliance or reduce volumes

Financial

Budgeted revenue targets more likely to be achieved

OPTION 2:

Approve fee amendments for some of those proposed at greater or lesser levels

Community Views

As above

Benefits

Lower fees than recommended likely to mean policy targets will not be achieved

Higher fees than recommended in some instances will increase likelihood of policy user fee target being achieved

Risks

Higher fees than recommended may increase the risk of public criticism

Financial

If lower increases are approved for some fees likely that budgeted revenue will not be achievable

OPTION 3:

Do not approve any fee increases

Community Views

As above

Benefits

Lower fees than recommended likely to mean policy targets will not be achieved

Risks

When increases eventually are made (to reduce the pressure on rates increases) the extent of the increase required will be publicly and politically unacceptable

Financial

If no increases are approved likely that budgeted revenue will not be achievable

Contribution of Recommended Option to Council’s Strategic Direction

Council’s Financial Strategy and Revenue & Financing Policy strive to ensure those who benefit from the provision of services are the ones who pay, where this is practicable.  The proposed changes to fees and charges attempt to ensure there is a reasonable chance of this happening

Rationale for the recommendations

1.         Overview of the problem or opportunity

1.1       The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the current status of fees and charges made by the Council and to recommend the adoption of updated fees for some of them.

1.2       It is important that fees and charges be regularly reviewed.  There are a variety of reasons for this including:

·        Compliance with legislative requirements – many fees and charges made by the Council are governed by specific legislation

·        Consistency with Council’s Revenue and Financing policy – for each activity the Council has adopted targets for the funding mix i.e. the proportion of costs to be funded from fees and charges

·        Transparency – in some instances it is important to be able to demonstrate that the charge being made represents a fair and reasonable recovery of the costs of providing a particular service

·        Market comparability – for some services the Council operates in a contestable market and it is important that fees and charges are responsive to market changes.

 

1.3       However as a review process is sometimes very time-consuming the depth of the review for each type of fee or charge may vary depending on the circumstances.

1.4       Attached as Appendix 1 is a schedule listing, in broad terms, the various types of fees and charges made by the Council.  The schedule is ordered by activity (consistent with the proposed 10 Year Plan 2018-28) and within that by function (consistent with the Revenue & Financing Policy).  Comments are made within the schedule outlining the reasons for there being no change recommended to a particular fee or charge.  In cases where changes are recommended more detail is provided in the appendices.

2.         Background and previous council decisions

2.1       Council has previously indicated that as a matter of policy it wishes all fee and charge revisions to be encapsulated in a single report to this Committee in February each year.  This report is a month later than planned due to staff commitments to the 10 Year Plan process.

2.2       Council’s current Revenue & Financing Policy (10 Year Plan 2015-25 pages 165-184) describes how the Council goes about deciding  who should pay for the provision of each activity and in what proportions.  The policy should be the foundation for decisions about the levels of fees and charges.  The proposed updated policy for 2018-28 makes no fundamental change to this.

2.3       The following table shows the indicative levels of direct user contribution (including through the use of targeted rates) sought to fund the operating costs for each activity as described in the Revenue & Financing Policy:

 Revenue & Financing Policy – Indicative levels of direct user contribution (incl. targeted rates*) sought toward activity cost

Low

0-19%

Med-Low

20-39%

Med

40-59%

Med-High

60-79%

High

80-100%

Economic development & international relations

Planning services- public

Urban design

Heritage management

Roads, street facilities, street lighting & traffic services

Active & public transport

Creative & exciting city

Arts, culture & heritage

Reserves & sportsfields

Swimming pools

Libraries & community centres

Civil defence & safer community initiatives

Biodiversity & sustainable practices

Stormwater

Leadership

Central Energy Trust Arena

Public Health

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conference & Function Centre

Building services

Cemeteries

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planning services – private

Parking

Social housing

Animal Control

 

 

************

 

Rubbish & Recycling#

Wastewater#

Water#

 

************

# significant portion of funding through targeted rates

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.4       For some activities (such as swimming pools) only a portion of the operating costs is borne by the Council and none of the revenue is received directly by the Council.  The current policy intention is that the ratio of external income to total operating costs is viewed taking into consideration the consolidated view (i.e. all of the revenue & costs of the activity).  However such an approach has been difficult to administer so the proposed policy now focuses only on the Council’s share of funding.  This means that Swimming Pools were previously included in the Medium funding category but will in future be in the Low category.

2.5       In some of the activities shown above it is not practical to charge users through a separate charge specifically related to use.  An example of this is water where large consumers are metered but the majority of users are charged through the rating system by way of a fixed targeted rate as the best proxy for direct user charge.

2.6       In some activities a combination of charging mechanisms is used.  Rubbish & recycling is an example.  Users are responsible for their own rubbish disposal.  The Council does provide a collection and disposal service which is funded from the sale of rubbish bags.  Recycling activity is funded from the sale of recyclables and the balance through the rating system by way of fixed targeted rates.

2.7       Council reviewed some fees and charges in February 2017 and confirmed in May 2017 those that were the subject of public consultation.  Additional planning charges were also considered In October and approved in December 2017.

3.         Description of options

3.1       With a few exceptions (e.g. cemetery/crematorium, conference & function centre), draft revenue budgets for 2018/19 have been set at levels which aim to meet the Revenue & Financing Policy proportion targets.  Achieving these revenue levels is dependent not only on the level of fee or charge set but also the actual volumes of activity by comparison with budget assumptions.

3.2       The timing of this review is scheduled to fit into the annual planning timetable in a way which ensures appropriate revenue assumptions are made in the proposed 10 Year or Annual Plans and changes to fees and charges can be implemented as soon as practicable.

3.3       Much of this report is focused on providing an overview of Council’s fees and charges.  However the report does include specific proposals for change for a number of fees and charges as explained in more detail in the following appendices:

 

 

 

Appendix

 

 

2

Planning & Miscellaneous

Proposal for public consultation

3

Building

 

Proposed increases

4

Environmental Health

 

Proposed increases

5

Animal Control

 

Proposed increases

6

Burial & Cremation

 

Proposed increases

7

Service Connections

 

Proposed increases

8

E-waste

Event Recycling

Proposed new regime of fees and charges

 

4.         Analysis of options

4.1       Analysis of the options for each of the fee types for individual activities is contained in the appendices.

 

5.         Conclusion

A broad review of fees and charges has been undertaken.  Revenue from these is an important part of the funding mix.  There are two elements to achieving revenue budgets.  The first is the actual level of the fee or charge.  The second is the volume of sales or use.  A change to the level of fee or charge can influence demand.  Achieving revenue targets is sometimes more about volumes than the level of the charge.  There is a fine balance between the two.  This report recommends increases in charges for, planning & miscellaneous, building, environmental health, animal control, burial & cremation, service connections, and formalises charges for e-waste and event recycling. 

Fees and charges for trade waste and sportsfields will be the subject of a separate report as soon as practicable.

 

 

 

 

6.         Next actions

6.1       There is a series of procedural steps to be followed to enable some of the revised fees and charges to be implemented.  In some cases (as specifically identified in the recommendations) this involves a period of public consultation and a report back to the Council for final confirmation (taking into account any public submissions). 

7.         Outline of community engagement process

7.1       The Revenue & Financing Policy incorporates the Council’s current views on what portion of each activity should be directly funded from users.  This policy forms part of the 10 Year Plan which was the subject of public consultation in 2015 and the updated policy is being consulted on in conjunction with the proposed 2018-28 10 Year Plan.

7.2       There are varying types of public consultation required to enable changes to be made to fees and charges.  For some the special consultative process or a process consistent with the principles of section 82 of the Local Government Act is to be used.  More detail about each is provided in the detailed appendices.

Compliance and administration

Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide?

No

Are the decisions significant?

No

If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water?

NA

Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan?

No

Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure?

Yes

Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions?

Yes

Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans?

No

 

 

Attachments

1.

Appendices 1 - 8

 

 

 

Steve Paterson

Strategy Manager Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

                       


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator