AGENDA

Finance and Performance Committee

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Susan Baty (Chairperson)

Jim Jefferies (Deputy Chairperson)

Grant Smith (The Mayor)

Adrian Broad

Leonie Hapeta

Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke

Lorna Johnson

Vaughan Dennison

Karen Naylor

Lew Findlay QSM

Bruno Petrenas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

 

 

 

Finance and Performance Committee MEETING

 

17 September 2018

 

 

 

Order of Business

 

1.         Apologies

2.         Notification of Additional Items

Pursuant to Sections 46A(7) and 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, to receive the Chairperson’s explanation that specified item(s), which do not appear on the Agenda of this meeting and/or the meeting to be held with the public excluded, will be discussed.

Any additions in accordance with Section 46A(7) must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.

Any additions in accordance with Section 46A(7A) may be received or referred to a subsequent meeting for further discussion.  No resolution, decision or recommendation can be made in respect of a minor item.

3.         Declarations of Interest (if any)

            Members are reminded of their duty to give a general notice of any interest of items to be considered on this agenda and the need to declare these interests.

 

4.         Public Comment

To receive comments from members of the public on matters specified on this Agenda or, if time permits, on other Committee matters.

(NOTE:     If the Committee wishes to consider or discuss any issue raised that is not specified on the Agenda, other than to receive the comment made or refer it to the Chief Executive, then a resolution will need to be made in accordance with clause 2 above.)

5.         Confirmation of Minutes                                                                                     Page 7

“That the minutes of the Finance and Performance Committee meeting of 20 August 2018 Part I Public be confirmed as a true and correct record.”  

6.         Palmerston North Airport Limited - Annual Report for 12 months ended 30 June 2018 & Instructions relating to Annual Meeting                                                           Page 11

Memorandum, dated 30 August 2018 presented by the Chief Financial Officer, Grant Elliott.

7.         Recommendation for Adoption 2017/18 Annual Report                                 Page 81

Memorandum, dated 4 September 2018 presented by the Finance Manager, Stuart McKinnon.

8.         Papaioea Place Redevelopment Quarterly Update                                          Page 85

Memorandum, dated 29 August 2018 presented by the Acting Property Manager, Bryce Hosking.

9.         Water Source Development and Security - Programme Budget Adjustments Page 93

Memorandum, dated 21 August 2018 presented by the Water & Waste Services Manager, Robert van Bentum.

10.       Committee Work Schedule                                                                              Page 107

    

 11.      Exclusion of Public

 

 

To be moved:

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting listed in the table below.

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Ground(s) under Section 48(1) for passing this resolution

12.

Supply of Two Side Arm Kerbside Collection Vehicles

Commercial Activities and Negotiations

s7(2)(h) and s7(2)(i)

13.

Award of Contract 3614 - New Artificial Turf at CET Arena

Commercial Activities

s7(2)(h)

14.

Funding Request

Negotiations

s7(2)(i)

 

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public as stated in the above table.

Also that the persons listed below be permitted to remain after the public has been excluded for the reasons stated.

Chief Executive (Heather Shotter), Chief Financial Officer (Grant Elliott), Acting Chief Infrastructure Officer (Ray Swadel), Acting General Manager – Strategy and Planning (David Murphy), General Manager - Community (Debbie Duncan), Acting General Manager – Customer (Leigh Sage), Human Resources Manager (Wayne Wilson), General Manager - Marketing and Communications (Sacha Haskell), because of their knowledge and ability to provide the meeting with advice on matters both from an organisation-wide context (being members of the Council’s Management Team) and also from their specific role within the Council.

Legal Counsel (John Annabell), because of his knowledge and ability to provide the meeting with legal and procedural advice.

Acting Governance and Support Team Leader (Stuart McKinnon) and Committee Administrators (Penny Odell, Rachel Corser and Courtney Kibby), because of their knowledge and ability to provide the meeting with procedural advice and record the proceedings of the meeting.

Acting Property Manager (Bryce Hosking), Logistics and Support Manager (Paul Compton) and Waste Operations Manager (Stewart Hay) because of their knowledge and ability to assist the meeting in speaking to their report and answering questions, noting that such officer will be present at the meeting only for the item that relate to their respective report.

[Add Third Parties], because of their knowledge and ability to assist the meeting in speaking to their report/s [or other matters as specified] and answering questions, noting that such person/s will be present at the meeting only for the items that relate to their respective report/s [or matters as specified].

 

 

   


 

Palmerston North City Council

 

Minutes of the Finance and Performance Committee Meeting Part I Public, held in the Council Chamber, First Floor, Civic Administration Building, 32 The Square, Palmerston North on 20 August 2018, commencing at 9.02am

Members

Present:

Councillor Susan Baty (in the Chair), The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Karen Naylor and Bruno Petrenas.

Non Members:

Councillors Brent Barrett, Rachel Bowen, Duncan McCann, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere.

Apologies:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) (on Council Business).

 

  

 

58-18

Apologies

 

Moved Susan Baty, seconded Vaughan Dennison.

The COMMITTEE RESOLVED

1.   That the Committee receive the apologies.

 

Clause 58-18 above was carried 16 votes to 0, the voting being as follows:

For:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors, Brent Barrett, Susan Baty Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere.

  

59-18

Confirmation of Minutes

 

Moved Susan Baty, seconded Aleisha Rutherford.

The COMMITTEE RESOLVED

1.   That the minutes of the Finance and Performance Committee meeting of 18 June 2018 Part I Public and Part II Confidential be confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

Clause 59-18 above was carried 14 votes to 1, with 1 abstention, the voting being as follows:

For:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas and Aleisha Rutherford.

Against:

Councillor Duncan McCann.

 

 

Abstained:

Councillor Tangi Utikere.

 

60-18

He Ara Kotahi Bridge Lighting

Report, dated 6 August 2018 from the Leisure Assets Planner, Jason Pilkington.

The Committee believed funds should be reallocated from existing budgets and the figure relating to funding applications should not be restricted to a specific amount.

 

Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Leonie Hapeta.

The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS

1.   That Council approves $1,210,000 for lighting the He Ara Kotahi Bridge and directs the Chief Executive to reallocate funds from existing infrastructure projects.

 

Moved Karen Naylor, seconded Grant Smith.

2.   That Council directs the Chief Executive to make funding applications for the purchase and installation of lights on the He Ara Kotahi Bridge and Plaza area.

 

Clause 60-18 above was carried 16 votes to 0, the voting being as follows:

For:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere.

 

61-18

Quarterly Performance and Financial Report - Quarter Ending 30 June 2018

Memorandum, dated 31 July 2018 from the Financial Accountant, Keith Allan and the Head of Community Planning, Andrew Boyle.

 

Moved Susan Baty, seconded Leonie Hapeta.

The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS

1.       That the Committee receive the June 2018 Quarterly Performance and Financial Report and note:

a.    The June 2018 financial performance and operating performance.

b.    The June 2018 capital expenditure programme progress together with those programmes identified as unable to be completed this financial year.

2.       That the Committee note that the capital expenditure carry forward values in the 2018/19 Annual Budget will be increased by a net $674,100 to the amount of remaining programme budgets.

 

Clause 61-18 above was carried 16 votes to 0, the voting being as follows:

For:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere.

 

62-18

Treasury Report for 12 months ended 30 June 2018

Memorandum, dated 30 July 2018 from the Strategy Manager Finance, Steve Paterson.

 

Moved Jim Jefferies, seconded Adrian Broad.

The COMMITTEE RESOLVED

1.   That the performance of the treasury activity for the 12 months ending 30 June 2018 be noted.

 

Clause 62-18 above was carried 16 votes to 0, the voting being as follows:

For:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere.

 

63-18

Committee Work Schedule

 

Moved Susan Baty, seconded Karen Naylor.

The COMMITTEE RESOLVED

1.   That the Finance and Performance Committee receive its Work Schedule dated August 2018.

 

Clause 63-18 above was carried 16 votes to 0, the voting being as follows:

For:

The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere.

The meeting finished at 10.21am

Confirmed 17 September 2018

 

 

 

Chairperson



 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

Memorandum

TO:                                Finance and Performance Committee

MEETING DATE:           17 September 2018

TITLE:                            Palmerston North Airport Limited - Annual Report for 12 months ended 30 June 2018 & Instructions relating to Annual Meeting

DATE:                            30 August 2018

PRESENTED BY:            Grant Elliott, Chief Financial Officer

APPROVED BY:             Heather Shotter, Chief Executive

 

 

RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Council

1.   That the Annual Report and Financial Statements of Palmerston North Airport Limited for the year ended 30 June 2018 be received.

2.   That the Council shareholder representative be instructed to support the proposed resolutions to be considered at the Annual Meeting of Palmerston North Airport Limited to be conducted by way of resolution in writing.

 

 

 

1.         ISSUE

Palmerston North Airport Ltd (PNAL) as a Council controlled trading organisation has prepared its Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2018.  This report provides a brief commentary on PNAL’s results for the year and recommends the Council’s shareholder representative be instructed to support the resolutions proposed for the Annual Meeting.

2.         BACKGROUND

2.1       PNAL’s Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2018 is attached.  The report gives a comprehensive assessment of company performance with key matters highlighted in the joint report of the Chairman and Chief Executive.  Performance is judged against the Statement of Intent adopted by the Board in May 2017 and endorsed by the Council in June 2017.

 

2.2       PNAL has had a very successful year with significant passenger and revenue growth and a consequential increase in the surplus after tax. Improvements to facilities for travellers and users provide an impressive gateway to the City.

 

2.3       Operating results are summarised in the following table:

 

Actual

2015/16

Actual

2016/17

 

Actual

2017/18

Budget

2017/18 SOI

5,522,881

7,313,379

Revenue

8,482,757

8,688,163

3,132,368

3,778,876

Operating Expenditure

4,408,861

4,590,544

2,390,513

3,534,503

Operating Surplus (before interest, depreciation & tax)

4,073,896

4,097,619

1,129,848

303,689

115,911

1,217,466

269,622

198,454

Depreciation

Finance Costs

Impairment & loss on sale of assets

1,582,752

279,238

922

1,685,551

486,475

77,000

841,065

1,848,961

Operating Surplus (before tax)

2,210,984

1,848,592

35,632

549,839

Taxation

601,965

517,606

805,433

1,299,122

Net Surplus after tax for year

1,609,019

1,330,987

 

2.4       The Company’s results, compared with the targets set in the Statement of Intent are shown in the following table:

 

Actual

2016/17

 

Actual

2017/18

SOI

Target

3.1%

Surplus, before interest/tax/revaluations to Total Assets

3.2%

3.0%

2.2%

Surplus, after interest/tax/revaluations to Shareholders’ funds

2.7%

2.1%

13.1

Surplus, before interest & tax to Interest

14.6

≥ 2.5 : 1

$59.6m

Tangible net worth (total tangible assets less total liabilities)

$60.7m

≥ $35m

81%

Ratio of consolidated shareholders’ funds to total assets

78%

≥ 40%

Maintained

Civil Aviation Rule part 139 certification (1)

Maintained

Maintain

na

High level of Customer satisfaction (2)

90%

≥ 90%

629,411

No. of passengers served through airport terminal

657,515

> 639,000

(1) The 5 yearly CAA audit was conducted in 2014, and the next audit will be completed in September 2019.

(2)   The customer satisfaction survey findings are based on a survey of 3,618 customers over the period July 2017 to January 2018

 

2.5       The Company applied $5.3m during the period to the purchase of fixed assets ($1.5m in the previous year).  This compares with the budgetary provision for capital expenditure of $10.1m ($50k of the actual expenditure was funded from asset sales compared with the budget provision of $3.1m for all of the planned work).

2.6       The Annual Report advises that Directors have proposed a total dividend of $643,650 based on the year’s results (compared with $519,649 for the previous year).  The total dividend is equivalent to 40% of the net surplus after tax (excluding capital contributions) which equates the target dividend return outlined in the Statement of Intent.  As the sole shareholder the Council receives the full dividend.  The Council’s budget assumption is $500,000.

 

2.7       The Company’s debt/equity ratio as at 30 June 2018 was 22:78 (19:81 at 30 June 2017).

 

2.8       The Company’s Constitution provides that the shareholders must approve the total remuneration payable to Directors.  In February 2016 Council approved a progressive increase over two years to $90,000.  The PNAL Board has determined to allocate this sum as $28,000 (chairperson) and $15,000 (remaining four directors) plus $2,000 for the chair of the audit and risk committee).  The Board is requesting that the total be increased to $124,000.  PNAL has benchmarked itself against other similar regional airports and the results of that are shown in Attachment 1.  The sum requested would enable the director remuneration to be pitched at approximately 5% above the 2017 figures for the four comparable airports.  It is proposed the new maxima remain for three years.

 

2.9       The Council is obliged to receive the report but has a choice as to whether or not to support the resolutions proposed for the Annual Meeting.  As the Council is the sole shareholder it is planned (as in recent years) to hold the Annual Meeting by way of entry in the minute book rather than to hold a physical meeting.  Company representatives will be available at the Finance and Performance Committee meeting to respond to any questions about Company performance over the past twelve months.

 

2.10     The Annual Meeting (by way of entry in the minute book) will have resolutions (as attached) covering the following:

 

2.10.1              Receipt of the Annual Report and financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2018

2.10.2              Advice of the Directors’ actions in relation to payment of a dividend for the year ended 30 June 2018

2.10.3              Approving the total remuneration of directors being $124,000 p.a.

2.10.4              Recording the reappointment of the Auditor General as auditor and to authorise the Directors to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

 

3.         NEXT STEPS

PNAL’s Annual Report will be published on the Company’s website and be made available at Council offices and libraries.  The resolutions for the Annual meeting will be authorised in writing by the Council’s shareholder representative.

4.         Compliance and administration

Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide?

 

No

Are the decisions significant?

No

If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water?

No

Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan?

No

Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure?

No

Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions?

Yes

Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans?

No

The recommendations contribute to Goal 1: An innovative and growing city

 

The recommendations contribute to the outcomes of the Economic Development Strategy

 

The recommendations contribute to the achievement of action/actions in the Economic Development Plan

The action is: operating a key gateway for people and freight to and from the city and the wider region; grow passenger numbers and freight using the airport.

Contribution to strategic direction

PNAL is playing an active part in growing the City.

 

 

Attachments

1.

Attachment 1 - PNAL Directors' Remuneration

 

2.

Annual Meeting Notice & Resolutions

 

3.

PNAL Annual report for year ending 30 June 2018

 

    


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

Memorandum

TO:                                Finance and Performance Committee

MEETING DATE:           17 September 2018

TITLE:                            Recommendation for Adoption 2017/18 Annual Report

DATE:                            4 September 2018

PRESENTED BY:            Stuart McKinnon, Finance Manager, Finance

APPROVED BY:             Grant Elliott, Chief Financial Officer

 

 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO Council

1. That the 2017/18 Annual Report and 2017/18 Summary Annual Report be adopted.

2.  That Council note that an Auditor’s “opinion” from Audit New Zealand would be          expected to be received immediately following recommended adoption         by        Council on 24 September 2018 and Council signing of the reports.

3.  That delegated authority is given to the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of the Finance and Performance Committee to make minor amendments to the 2017/18 Annual Report and 2017/18 Summary Annual Report.

 

 

 

1.         ISSUE

The Council has a legal obligation to adopt its audited Annual Report within four months after the end of the financial year to which it related. Adoption at the 24 September 2018 Council meeting is within this period. Adoption of the Annual Report will allow the Council to report to the community on the Council’s performance in the 2017/18 year.

The Annual Report is a key part of the 10 Year Plan and Annual Budget process.  Those plans show the community what the Council intends to do, including what it intended to do in the 2017/18 year.  The Annual Report shows the community how well the Council did that work.

 

Adoption of the recommended actions will allow the Council to deliver the 2017/18 Annual Report and Summary Annual Report.

 

The recommended actions fit within the whole 10 Year Plan process and reports on all levels of service.  All costs involved with preparation of the Annual Report are provided for within the current budget.

 

2.         BACKGROUND

The quarterly report for June 2018 indicated a Parent draft, unaudited net surplus after tax of $14,900,000 for the 2017/18 year. This has now been finalised with the final net surplus after tax unchanged. Minor annual valuations resulted in Other Comprehensive Revenue and Expense of $42,000. This gives a Parent Total Comprehensive Revenue and Expense surplus of $14,942,000 and for the consolidated Group $17,628,000 surplus.

Audit New Zealand have completed their audit of the Annual Report. Audit clearance is expected before the Committee meeting.

A copy of the draft Annual Report and the draft Summary Annual Report have been circulated with this report.

The presentation of the Annual Report is the culmination of the quarterly reports presented to the Council, which have monitored progress against the 2017/18 Annual Budget.

The levels of service and performance measures by activities in the 2017/18 Annual Budget reflect a clear link to what the Council was aiming to achieve. The Council received comprehensive quarterly reports on its performance during the 2017/18 year.

The Council’s strategic direction is incorporated into the 10 Year Plan and Annual Budgets and shows the community how Council intended to achieve its vision and goals. The Annual Report includes reporting on progress to achieve those vision and goals.

The adoption of the Council’s Annual Report marks a milestone of the Council’s accountability and dedication to the public.  The wide-ranging and complex nature of Council activities together with the requirements for disclosure under the Local Government Act, and Public Benefit Entity Accounting Standards, means the Council’s full Annual Report is relatively lengthy and yet necessary. This complexity makes the Summary Annual Report an ideal document for those readers who wish to have an easy read and yet still understand the Council’s activities.

 

After considering the issues, background, all relevant options, the community views, Council’s policies and plans, along with the financial and legal implications, it is recommended that the Committee receive the 2017/18 Annual Report and the Summary Annual Report. Further it is proposed that the Committee recommends the Annual Report and the Summary Annual Report for Council’s adoption in its meeting scheduled for 24 September 2018.

 

 

 

3.         NEXT STEPS

Once the Annual Report has been adopted by Council and Auditor’s opinion received, copies of both the full and summary annual report will be immediately printed and become available for distribution.  Copies will be sent to the organisations prescribed by legislation and to regular readers according to Council’s existing mailing list.  The Annual Report and its Summary will also be made available on the Council’s website, at the City Library and the Customer Service Centre.

 

4.         Compliance and administration

Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide?

If Yes quote relevant clause(s) from Delegations Manual

No

Are the decisions significant?

No

If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water?

No

Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan?

No

Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure?

No

Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions?

Yes

Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans?

No

The recommendations contribute to Goal 5: A Driven and Enabling Council

The recommendations contribute to the outcomes of the Driven and Enabling Council Strategy

The recommendations contribute to the achievement of action/actions in a plan under the Driven and Enabling Council Strategy

The action is: to enable Council to exercise governance by reviewing financial performance and operating performance and provide accountability to the public.

Contribution to strategic direction

As above.

 

 

Attachments

1.

Draft Annual Report (attached separately)  

 

2.

Draft Summary Annual Report (attached separately)  

 

    



 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

Memorandum

TO:                                Finance and Performance Committee

MEETING DATE:           17 September 2018

TITLE:                            Papaioea Place Redevelopment Quarterly Update

DATE:                            29 August 2018

PRESENTED BY:            Bryce Hosking, Acting Property Manager, Infrastructure

APPROVED BY:             Ray Swadel, Acting Chief Infrastructure Officer

 

 

RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Council

1.   That the memorandum dated 29 August 2018 and titled `Papaioea Place Redevelopment Quarterly Update’ be received for information.

 

 

 

1.         ISSUE

1.1       Stage 1 of the Papaioea Place housing project is funded through Programmes 357 and 1277 – C/fwd of the 2018 10 Year Plan. 

 

1.2       The Finance and Performance Committee Chairperson has requested a quarterly update to be brought back to the Finance and Performance meeting for the duration of the construction period. 

 

1.3       The Construction Programme was received from Latitude Homes in June and presented to Finance and Performance at the 18 June 2018 meeting for information.

 

2.         BACKGROUND

2.1       The Papaioea Place project form of contract is a design and build contract between Palmerston North City Council (Principal) and Latitude Homes (Contractor) of New Plymouth.  The overall project management is being provided by WT Partnership Advisory from Auckland.  Day to day project management is being carried out by Council Technical Services staff.

 

2.2       Site meetings and Project Control Group meetings are held on the last Thursday of each month.  The most recent being 30 August 2018.

 

Summary - Project Control Group Meeting 3 – 30 August 2018

 

2.3       Health and Safety 

There have been two health and safety incidents on site to date.  One was a subcontractor that fell off a ladder; one was a Latitude staff member who twisted an ankle.  Both incidents had incident reports submitted to WT Partnership and PNCC.

 

Two members of the public were seen walking through the site at the weekend.  Additional ‘No Admittance’ signs have been erected at the site entrances.

 

2.4       Programme

Blocks 1a and 1b are on programme.

 

Blocks 2a and 2b are two weeks behind due to inclement weather, soft ground conditions that required additional excavation and discovery of underground services that were not located on any site plans.  Latitude will be submitting a claim for two weeks for weather delays.

 

2.5       Regulatory

The amendment to the Resource Consent for the two additional units in Stage 1 was to be submitted to Council on 31 August 2018.

 

2.6       Design

Internal wall colours have been confirmed. 

 

Connections and cables into the ceiling spaces for Sky dishes have been approved.  This means that one dish can be used for multiple Sky connections.

 

The contractor proposed an additional light switch by the bed which was approved.

 

2.7       Financial

Variations to date       $37,854           Excavation of soft spots, asbestos removal

                                    $  4,760           Provision for Sky connections

                                    $  5,040           Additional light switches

                                    $47,654

 

These variations are able to be accommodated within the project contingency as can be seen from the Project Budget Status table below.

 

 

 

 

Description

Project Budget

Budget Variance

Final Forecast

Construction

$6,646,031

$116,046

$6,529,985

Professional Fees

$265,400

$0

$265,400

Authorities Fees

$55,000

$0

$55,000

Construction Contingency

$332,561

$116,046

$448,607

Project Contingency

$333,000

$0

$333,000

Total

$7,631,992

$0

$7,631,992

 

3.         NEXT STEPS

3.1       Continue the construction programme to complete Stage 1 as per the budget and timeline.

4.         Compliance and administration

Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide?

If Yes quote relevant clause(s) from Delegations Manual <Enter clause>

No

Are the decisions significant?

No

If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water?

No

Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan?

No

Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure?

No

Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions?

Yes

Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans?

No

 

The recommendations contribute to Goal 3: A Connected and Safe Community

 

The recommendations contribute to the outcomes of the Connected Community Strategy

 

The recommendations contribute to the achievement of action/actions in the Social Housing Plan

The action is:

·    Upgrade the Papaioea housing complex (by end of 2018/2019).

 

Contribution to strategic direction

Programme 357 is stage 1 of the Papaioes Place Redevelopment project to demolish 32 existing units and create 50 new units in their place which will be suitable for tenants to age in place.

 

 

 

Attachments

1.

Papaioea Place Construction Programme

 

2.

Papaioea Place Stage 1 Portions

 

    




PDF Creator



 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

Memorandum

TO:                                Finance and Performance Committee

MEETING DATE:           17 September 2018

TITLE:                            Water Source Development and Security - Programme Budget Adjustments

DATE:                            21 August 2018

PRESENTED BY:            Robert van Bentum, Water & Waste Services Manager, Infrastructure

APPROVED BY:             Ray Swadel, Acting Chief Infrastructure Officer

 

 

RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Council

1.   That the budget for the 2018/19 Capital New Programme 985 “Kelvin Grove Water Supply Zone - New Bore” be revised from $537,000 to $887,000 by utilising:

·    savings of $100,000 from 2018/19 Water Capital New Programme 592 “Turitea WTP – Sludge Handling and Disposal Improvements,

·    savings of $100,000 from 2018/19 Water Programme 1005 “Industrial Growth – Installation of Water Supply Systems to an Expanded NEIZ, and

·    reallocating funding of $150,000 from Capital New Programme 246 Water Subdivision Contributions.

2.   That a new 2018/19 Capital New Programme called “UV Treatment for Papaioea Park Bore 3” with a budget of $550,000 be approved by:

·    reallocating budget of $130,000 from 2018/19 Capital New Programme 1404 “Turitea WTP – New Retaining Walls on Access Road and

·    approving additional unbudgeted funding of $420,000.

3.   That approval be given to bring $750,000 forward two years in the LTP from 2020/21 to 2018/19 for Programme 1384 – Citywide New Water Reservoirs to Enhance Supply Storage to enable construction of a contact tank at Railway Road bore.

4.   That the budget for the 2018/19 Water Capital New Programme 593 “Water Safety and Security Mitigation” be revised from $23,000 to $264,500 by approving an additional $241,500 in unbudgeted funding.

 

 

 

1.         ISSUEs

1.1       Council’s Long-Term Water Supply Development Strategy, previously outlined to Council has identified several key vulnerabilities in respect of the current water supply source provision, particularly in respect of the level of redundancy to cater for unplanned outages and seismic events. The strategy also sets out a programme of investment in replacement and new bores required to maintain current source capacity and provide for residential and industrial growth.

1.2       As part of the 2018-28 Long Term Plan (LTP) Council has approved programmes of work to improve resilience and meet expected new treatment standards for surface water supply. In addition, Council had previously approved in 2017-18 a programme of work to address water supply safety and security concern at the Turitea WTP and the bores. Funding for some of these programmes has been carried forward to enable completion of the programme of works in the 2018-19 year. The specific programmes include:

·    Programme 985 (1235 c/fwd) – Kelvin Grove Water Supply Zone – New Bore - to fund construction of a new bore at Kelvin Grove both to meet growth and provide for resilience

·    Programme 1384 Citywide – New Water Supply Reservoirs to Replace Earthquake Prone Reservoir and Enhance Supply Storage Across City

·    Programme 124 – Turitea Water Treatment Plant – for upgrades to the treatment plant at Turitea to respond to Review of Drinking Water Standards

·    Programme 593 – Water Safety and Security Mitigation

·    Programme 1058 – Groundwater Bores Renewal - to fund renewal of existing bore capacity to address the decline in bore yield over time.

·    Programmes 1285, 1170, and 1005 to support growth by funding new bores and/or network infrastructure in Whakarongo, City West and NEIZ.

 

1.3       While the programmes provide significant capital funding for investment in new and upgraded water supply source, treatment and storage infrastructure several issues have emerged which necessitate and justify rescheduling of existing funding within the first 3 years of the LTP, reallocation of 2018-19 capital budgets and approval of additional unbudgeted expenditure. Four specific issues, summarised below, are considered in detail in this report.

·    Issue 1.  Allocated budgets for completion and commissioning of the new Railway Road bore under Programme 985 (1235 c/fwd) are inadequate to complete and commission the bore.

·    Issue 2.  The new Papaioea Park bore, constructed under Water Capital Renewal Programme 1058, cannot now be commissioned without provision of UV disinfection which is beyond the scope of the original programme given that UV disinfection has never previously been required for groundwater bores in Palmerston North.

·    Issue 3.  The development of a new bore at Railway Road and replacement bores at Papaioea Park and Keith Street, has provided an opportunity to realise both resilience and efficiency benefits associated with providing storage at each bore location. Unfortunately funding under Programme 1384 of the LTP for construction of storage is not scheduled to occur until 2019/20 and 2020/21.

·    Issue 4.  Additional water safety and security risks have emerged since finalisation of the 2018-28 LTP, which Officers now believe need to be prioritised in order to ensure PNCC maintains its current 100% drinking water supply compliance record and meets its obligations under the Health and Safety at Work Act – 2015.

 

1.4       Each of the issues is detailed more fully and analysis provided of options for reallocation of savings, transfer of funds by deferral of works in the current year and as a last resort approval of additional unbudgeted expenditure. The consequences of not progressing with the projects will be an inability to complete and commission new and replacement bore capacity both to meet summer peak demand requirements and on-going demand growth.

1.5       In submitting this report, Officers wish to stress the challenges which are currently facing the water supply sector, including the high level of national scrutiny amid multiple external reviews, significant increased vigilance in respect of compliance as well as the high level of uncertainty around regulatory and compliance changes. It is within this context that Officers have recommended a risk averse approach to providing and investing in water supply services. It is regretted that this has led to a request for further unbudgeted expenditure, however every attempt has been taken to identify offset savings both in respect of 2018/19 capital programmes and future savings in respect of both renewals and re-current operational costs.

2.         Railway Road Bore Commissioning – Programme 985

2.1       The new Railway Road bore is a key component of the city’s investment in additional source water capacity to meet growing residential and commercial demand and provision of a second supplementary source of supply for the Kelvin Grove zone. The bore will also provide critical back-up and resilience for the Roberts Line and Keith Street bore stations in the event of unplanned outage.

2.2       The drilling, testing and consenting of the Railway Road bore has been completed, with the yield and water quality more than meeting expectation. Unfortunately, the drilling work was protracted due both to the selected drilling method (cable-tool) and low level of productivity of the contractor. The significant delay of nearly a year has resulted in several unexpected changes to the scope of works.

2.3       The final commissioning components of the project have been designed and tendered and final costs for many of these changes are now known. Significant scope changes and additional costs have been incurred for the following:

·    Changes to HSNO regulations requiring more stringent provisions for storing and handling chemicals including making provision for bulk transporter delivery of chemicals

·    More stringent water quality monitoring following the Havelock North event requiring additional on-line monitoring equipment

·    Increases in the cost of construction due to the delay in final design and tender for the pump station and chemical dosing plant including civil works, electrical and controls and pipe works

·    Higher than expected costs for installing a new transformer

·    Additional landscaping assessment, planting and fencing requirements

·    Additional costs to purchase land along the north-western boundary to mitigate the loss of effective land footprint due to the landscaping offset requirements along each of the Robert’s Line and Railway Line frontages

 

2.4       The original approved budget for Programme 985 (1235 c/fwd) was $1,488,000 in the 2016-17 financial year. Carry forwards of $644,000 into 2017-18 and $537,000 into 2018-19 were approved by Council. The estimated cost to complete the overall programme of work is now estimated to $1,838,000 or $350,000 more than the original budget approved two years ago.

2.5       Officers have considered carefully the range of programmes being delivered in the three waters area to identify any potential savings to offset the additional costs. Three programmes have been identified with currently identified savings or unallocated funds. In two cases the savings have been identified following confirmation of the scope required to deliver on the programme outcomes for this financial year such that the budget reductions will not risk the achievement of the programme outcomes. In the third case there is no confirmed requirement for the work, as the requirements only emerge during the year. A brief description of the specific savings proposed for re-allocation are outlined as follows and summarised in Table 1 below.

·    Programme 592-Turitea Water Treatment Plant - Sludge Handling and Disposal Improvements. The scope of work has been confirmed and the cost is significantly less than budgeted.  Current budget of $154,304 has a confirmed required commitment of $54,304 leading to a surplus of $100,000.

·    Programme 1005 – Installation of Water Supply Systems to an Expanded North-East Industrial Zone. The immediate scope of work to extend the mains to Richardson’s Line is confirmed and will be constructed this financial year. A balance of $100,000 is available to support commissioning the Railway Road bore, because the known development requirements will be met by the expanded network, and funding in the following years will be available to construct further network extensions.

·    Programme 246 – Citywide Water Subdivision Contributions. This programme is provided to enable Council to contribute to sub-division development costs for water infrastructure where there is a wider benefit to the city. Historically there has been a limited call on the funds. It is proposed to reallocate $150,000 of the $200,000 budget leaving a remainder $50,000 to support any applications. There is a risk that this provision will not be adequate and this will require a further funding relocation or an approach for additional funding.

 

Table 1            Proposed Capital New Programme Budget Adjustments

 

Prog ID

Description

2018/19 Budget

Proposed 2018/19 Budget

Change

985

Kelvin Grove Water Supply Zone – New Bore

$537,000

$887,000

$350,000

592

Turitea WTP – Sludge Handling and Disposal Improvements

$154,304

$54,304

-$100,000

1005

Installation of Water Supply Systems to an Expanded NEIZ

$384,000

$284,000

-$100,000

246

Citywide Water Subdivisions Contributions

$200,000

$50,000

-$150,000

 

Totals

$1,275,304

$1,275,304

$0

 

3.         UV Treatment for Papaioea park bore 3

3.1       There are currently two existing bores at Papaioea Park with a combined yield capacity of 270m3/hr. The bore capacity has declined significantly over time, as for example in 2013, Bore 2 alone was capable of producing 400m3/hr. In response to this yield decline and as allowed for in Programme 1058 - Citywide Ground Water Renewal, construction of a replacement bore was commenced in 2016/17. The drilling work for Papaioea Bore 3, installation of a submersible pump and construction of the bore headworks was completed ahead of proposed commissioning in January 2018. The bore test confirmed an available yield of 360m3/hr.

3.2       Unfortunately, during the commissioning process the unexpected presence of total coliform bacteria forced a halt to commissioning works. This was completely unexpected as thorough disinfection procedures had been followed for all elements of the bore construction works including thorough disinfection of the pumps and pipe work prior to installation in the bore.

3.3       It was elected to flush the bore for an extended period from late January to April 2018 in the expectation that the bacteria would be cleared from the bore. However, while the bacterial counts reduced during flushing to low levels, they subsequently returned at higher levels post flushing.

3.4       Officers and staff then implemented an in-situ disinfection procedure which involved injecting a super chlorinated solution into the bore. This method which is routinely used in Australia was approved by Horizons Regional Council and undertaken on the 22 May 2018. Unfortunately, after a few days with bacteria clear results, the coliforms returned albeit at very low levels. A few days after the bore disinfection, a single positive e.coli was also recorded during routine sampling. This has effectively disqualified the bore from achieving secure status in the interim.  

3.5       Under the Current Drinking Water Standards, water from bores which achieve secure status do not require treatment although a disinfection residual is recommended to provide for contaminant entry to the distribution network. A key criterion for achieving secure bore status is the absence of e.coli. from daily sampling and testing over a 12-month period. However, interim security status may be granted at the discretion of the Drinking Water Assessor while the daily testing is in progress.

3.6       Bore 3 had been given an interim security determination based on being connected to the same aquifer as Bore 1, only 23 m away, which had a long history of bacterial and protozoal compliance. Unfortunately the single positive e.coli. has triggered the requirement for 12 months of bacterial monitoring before the bore can be commissioned in its current state. If any daily sample records a positive e.coli. result then the 12-month monitoring period begins again.

3.7       The only practical way to enable the bore to be commissioned is to implement treatment for both bacterial and protozoal compliance. Any treatment process will also require 12 months of protozoal monitoring data.

3.8       Following discussions with the Drinking Water Assessor, Officers have received agreement in writing that given the chance of any positive protozoa test result is remote, interim security for protozoa, supported by 12 months of monitoring, can be assumed provided UV treatment is implemented sufficient to achieve both protozoa and bacterial compliance as required by the Drinking Water Standards. Officers have initiated protozoa monitoring of the bore.

3.9       Officers are working through the detailed scoping and design for implementing UV treatment of the bore, however firm cost estimates for the supply and installation of UV equipment and associated pipe works, building, electrical wiring and controls based on similar installations in other New Zealand locations are of the order of $550,000.

3.10     While there is a chance that the 12 months of protozoa and e coli monitoring may result in no further positive results, awaiting this finding will delay commissioning of the bore until this time next year. There is also the very real risk that a further positive result will reset in the clock being re-set pushing out commissioning further. Without investment in UV disinfection, there is no possibility of the bore being available to support summer water requirements, and it is almost certain that a similar cautious approach with implementing extended water restrictions will need to be applied this coming summer as in 2017-18. It should be noted that some level of water restrictions or conservation measures will be applied to manage demand to within consent limits.

3.11     Connecting the bore without UV treatment will result in a determination of non-compliance with respect to the Drinking Water Standards. Such a decision is strongly opposed by Officers as it undermines the strenuous efforts and significant investment made in maintaining Palmerston North’s strong compliance record.

3.12     Officers have considered the full range of 2018/19 programmes of work to identify and potential savings. Only one available reallocation has been identified as follows:

·    Programme 1404 - Turitea Water Treatment Plant – New Retaining Walls on Access Road.  The programme is provided to enable funding of new retaining walls in response to instability. Recent inspection of the access road has not identified any work requirements so the programme is currently unallocated. If the funds are reallocated as proposed, there is the risk that Officers will need to return to Council to seek funding for any remedial works.  Current budget of $130,000 has no current commitments and therefore the available budget for re-allocation is $130,000.

3.13     Aside from the programme reallocation identified, an additional sum of $420,000 of unbudgeted expenditure in 2018/19 is required to provide the required budget of $550,000 for the works.

3.14     Allowing for the reallocation of $130,000 from Programme 1404, the net new borrowing in 2019/20 will be $420,000. The estimated additional rates impact of an additional $400,000 of capital borrowing is an increase in rates of $30,000 per annum from 2019/20 or an extra $1.1 on the targeted water rate.

4.         Storage and Treatment Enhancement at Bore Stations – Programme 1384

4.1       Council approved Programme 1384 – Citywide – New Water Supply Reservoirs to replace an earthquake prone reservoir and enhance supply storage in the 2018-28 LTP. The programme provides for spending of $8.2M over 10 years to build a new treated water reservoir at Ngahere Park and smaller reservoirs at each of the bore stations across the city.

4.2       The bore station reservoir storage will achieve three distinct benefits related to supply security, operational efficiencies and drinking water compliance including:

·    enable bores to be either pumped or allowed to discharge by artesian head at a steady rate to on-site storage extending the life of the bore and delaying new bore investment

·    provide distributed treated stored water for emergency water supply post disaster e.g. seismic event

·    enable bore water to be effectively treated with chlorine to achieve Drinking Water Standard recommended Free Available Chlorine (FAC) levels of 0.2mg/l in the network

 

4.3       The bore station reservoirs as indicated will be sized to buffer within day peak flows from the network so enabling the bores to fill the reservoir either by artesian or low head pumping at a steady rate. Conservatively it is expected that this will extend the typical life of the bores once drilled from 15 to 20 years i.e. 5 years more life. In addition, it is estimated that because the installation of booster pumps provides additional peak day capacity with the current bores, new bore investment to meet growth can be delayed by several years.

4.4       The bore station reservoirs which will may vary from 250 to 1000m3 in volume, will provide distributed stored water available in a post-disaster situation e.g. seismic event, for tanker distribution. This distributed clean water will be critical to cover the period prior to networks and source capacity being restored.

4.5       The bore station reservoirs will also provide the necessary storage volume to enable breakpoint chlorination of the bore water to be achieved and enable water with FAC levels of 0.2mg/l in the network to be delivered. Currently because of concerns with discoloured water generation as a result of direct chorine injection into the delivery pipeline, Council relies on chloramine as the disinfection residual for network disinfection. While widely used in overseas jurisdictions, New Zealand Drinking Water Standards promote FAC.

4.6       In December 2017 the Government appointed panel released their Stage Two Report on the Havelock North Drinking Water Inquiry, which set out strong recommendations that the secure bore status be removed and that treatment and compliance with the Drinking Water Standards be made mandatory. At this stage Council is still awaiting the government’s decision on the recommendations. However the panel were adamant in their recommendation that mandatory treatment be an immediate priority for all bores.

4.7       Chlorination by means of chlorine gas is the preferred treatment method of Council both due to its cost and because Council already provides for chlorination albeit to low levels. The key change is achievement of FAC levels not less than 0.2mg/l within the reticulation. Officers have identified that the only practical way to achieve FAC in the treated water is to provide a contact tank post-chlorination.

4.8       Programme 1384 already provides for funds to construct a reservoir tank at each of the bore stations. Given commissioning works are underway at three bore sites, Officers have identified the value of aligning reservoir construction with the bore commissioning. Alignment of the two programmes and completion of the work in 2018/19 will result in some capital savings. Delay of the reservoir construction by 2 years will require both pipe work and chlorination installation modifications at an estimated additional cost of $80,000. These costs are avoided if the programmes are aligned.

4.9       Officers are seeking to bring forward $750,000 from 2020/21 for Programme 1384 to fund one reservoir at Railway Road bore site.

4.10     The key disadvantages of not proceeding immediately with the storage tank at the Railway Road bore includes additional costs to modify pipe connections in 2 years’ time, the delay of the opportunity to optimise the life of the bore and the likelihood that construction of storage will soon become mandatory if is as expected the Drinking Water Standards are revised. An assessment of the net impact on rates is set out in Table 2 below based on the following assumptions:

·    new bore life extended from 15 to 20 years with storage

·    cost of modifications if storage construction is delayed - $80,000

·    delay to the date for investment in the new Whakarongo bore of 1 year

 

4.11     The impact of bringing forward the reservoir programme budget and delaying the new bore investment at Whakarongo is small compared to the impact of delaying renewal investment in bore development and renewal. The net impact on rates is small with an increase in years 1 to 3 and a reduction in years 4 to 7 of the LTP.  Over the 10 years of the Plan, there is a net reduction of -$54,000 in borrowing largely due to the deferral of the investment in the new Whakarongo bore by one year.

Table 2            Assessment of Impact of Bringing Forward Reservoir Construction in Programme 1384

Prog ID

Description

18/19 ($000)

19/20 ($000)

20/21

($000)

21/22 ($000)

22/23 ($000)

23/24 ($000)

24/25 ($000)

25/26 ($000)

26/27 ($000)

27/28 ($000)

Current Programme Schedule

 

1384

New Water Supply Reservoirs

 

$513

$1,783

$0

$1,869

$0

$1,966

$0

$2,071

$0

1004

Whakarongo – New Waters Systems

$135

$739

$836

$1,463

$323

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Revised Programme Schedule

 

1384

New Water Supply Reservoirs

$750

$513

$1033

$0

$1,869

$0

$1,966

$0

$2,071

$0

1004

Whakarongo – New Waters Systems

$135

$739

$336

$500

$1,463

$323

$0

$0

$0

$0

Difference Capital New

$750

$0

-$1250

-$963

$1,140

$323

$0

$0

$0

$0

Rates Impact

$21

$52

$17

-$62

-$69

-$13

$0

$0

$0

$0

 

5.         Programme 593 – Water Safety and security Mitigation

5.1       For the last two financial years, Council has approved new or re-allocated capital funding of $138,000 for a series of security and safety initiatives to address identified risks and vulnerabilities in the water supply system which increased the risk of either delivery of unsafe drinking water or technical non-compliances which threatened Council’s 100% compliance record for bacteria and protozoa free drinking water. Specific initiatives funded from this programme included:

·    Renewal of several critical variable speed drives

·    Replacement of the in-line valves between the raw and treated water mains at Turitea WTP

·    Purchase of a replacement bore pump for the Takaro bore

·    Modification of the filter modules at Turitea to prevent contamination

·    Replacement and lowering of the Railway Road bore pump

·    Raising of the Takaro bore head (still in progress)

 

5.2       While the last of the upgrade and improvement works is due to be completed in the current financial year, staff has continued to review and assess risks and vulnerabilities. During the 2017-18 year staff has identified three additional areas of safety and security concern. These have been highlighted by internal audits and by several incidents which have highlighted weaknesses in existing monitoring systems and processes.

5.3       The first area relates to monitoring of fluoride levels in treated water. Aside from Turitea WTP which has on-line monitoring, all the bores rely on weekly sampling and testing. During the year there were two technical non-compliances in respect of fluoride levels in the treated water supplies at Ashhurst and Longburn. These have indicated a need to strengthen monitoring systems in this area.

5.4       Secondly the specific requirements and obligations for the water sector of several recent national legislative changes have become clearer. These requirements relate particularly to the obligation of the employer for their staff and specific controls and safeguards for chemicals in the workplace. The two relevant pieces of legislation are:

·    Hazard Substances and New Organisms Amendment Act – 2015 and

·    Health and Safety at Work Act – 2015

 

5.5       The third area of security concern has arisen in respect of unplanned power outages at the Turitea WTP. During 2017/18 power supply to the Turitea plant was lost on two occasions and for different reasons the back-up generator failed in both cases to supply power in time to avoid a loss of monitoring data, although there was no risk of unsafe drinking water being supplied. While in both cases operators were alerted to the issue and restored normal operation within hours, the consequences of the data monitoring gap is a non-compliance with respect to the Drinking Water Standards.

5.6       The risk associated with the current weekly fluoride sampling and testing at the bore stations while compliant with the Drinking Water Standards, was exposed in the last year. In one instance elevated levels of fluoride were dosed to the supply (Longburn) for a number of days following an error on the part of an external contractor. Officers recommend that the current weekly manual sampling and testing be replaced with on-line monitoring at all bore sites. On-line monitoring will provide alarm alerts when fluoride levels stray outside the target range, enabling timely response before there is any material delivery of water with elevated fluoride levels to the network. Council had already implemented day tanks at each bore which limit the total volume of fluoride solution which can be added in a single day.

5.7       The total cost for installing on-line fluoride monitors at each bore is estimated to be $9,500 per site or $66,500 for all 7 bore stations. This work is considered high priority or Priority 1.

5.8       Following the passing into law of the new HSW Act and HSNO Amendment Act, and feedback on interpretation of the compliance requirements, Operations Staff have received expert advice and completed condition assessment of the Turitea WTP and bore installations to identify necessary improvements. There are a significant number of modifications to meet all aspects of the new legislation. The specific areas of improvement required include:

·    improvements to platforms and hand rails, installation of new permanent stairs where removable ladders had been used and installation of mountings for safety harness systems to access tanks and chambers for routine and scheduled maintenance (estimated cost $95,000 – Priority 1)

·    installation of weighing systems and seismic restraints to the chlorine installations at four bore sites (estimated cost $65,000 – Priority 2)

·    installation of emergency shutoff systems for chlorine gas at 5 bore sites (estimated cost $75,000 – Priority 2)

 

5.9       Finally Officers are recommending improvements at the Turitea WTP, to prevent any unplanned loss of power or plant malfunction which results either in a monitoring data gap of more than 3 minutes or treated water which is outside the compliance standard from being delivered to the network. Despite operator vigilance and significant additional investment in renewals and safety upgrades, there have been 7 incidents in the last two years which have met these criteria.

5.10     Officers have scoped and confirmed that the installation of automatically actuated shutdown valves on both the inlet to and outlet from the Turitea Water Treatment Plant will ensure that whatever conditions occur in the plant, any data loss or non-compliant water can be used to trigger valve activation. Closure of the two valves will provide confidence to the Drinking Water Assessor that no treated water was delivered to the network during any event. The valves will be powered from the existing IPS (interruptible power supply) to ensure near failsafe operation.

5.11     Currently valves can only be shut manually which continues to expose Council to a potential non-compliance given the plant is unmanned for most of the time. Despite the significant investment in improved systems, data capture and equipment reliability, there can be no guarantee that an outage will not occur. The firm estimate of cost to implement the auto shut system is $80,000 including electrical and controls.

5.12     Officers have considered the priorities for all the above improvements and are seeking funding in the current year for the priority 1 works namely on-line fluoride monitors, health and safety improvements and the auto-shut system at the Turitea WTP. Funding to implement the priority 2 works namely chlorine gas storage and safety improvements will be applied for in the 2019-20 financial year.

5.13     The risk of not implementing the Priority 1 improvements as proposed includes:

·    potential non-compliance with the fluoride requirements under the Drinking Water Standards

·    potential prosecution in respect of the HSE Act in the event of an health and safety incident resulting in injury which can be traced to the failure to mitigate the risks identified

·    potential non-compliance with the Drinking Water Compliance requirements particularly in respect of loss of monitoring data and/or provision of non-compliant drinking water

 

5.14     While none of the risks being addressed are likely to result in provision of unsafe drinking water, they all directly impact on compliance by Palmerston North with legislative obligations and failure to do so will contribute to reputational risk. Officers therefore seek additional unbudgeted funding for the 2018/19 year for Programme 593 – Water Safety and Security Mitigation of $241,500 to take the programme budget to $264,500 to provide for the following work:

·    on-line fluoride monitoring equipment for all bore stations - $66,500

·    health and safety improvements to platforms, railings, ladders and harness attachments - $95,000

·    auto-shutoff valve installation at the Turitea WTP - $80,000

 

5.15     The financial impact of the additional capital borrowing of $241,500 is an additional $16,000 per annum in rates starting in 2019/20 or $0.75 on the targeted water rate. The additional cost needs to be weighed against both the reputational and other non-financial impacts of a serious water supply non-compliance or serious health and safety incident.

Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide?

If Yes quote relevant clause(s) from Delegations Manual <Enter clause>

No

Are the decisions significant?

No

If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water?

No

Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan?

No

Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure?

No

Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions?

No

Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans?

No

The recommendations contribute to Goal 4: An Eco City

The recommendations contribute to the outcomes of the Eco City Strategy

The recommendations contribute to the achievement of action/actions in the Three Waters Plan

The actions contributed to include:

·    provision of a safe water supply to the city

·    increase water supply source capacity through the development of additional bores

·    enhance and improve efficiency of water networks

Contribution to strategic direction

The recommendations will ensure Council is able to develop adequate new source capacity to maintain and augment source capacity as bore yields decline at Papaioea Park.  The recommendations will enable completion of the Railway Road bore and so secure additional source water to meet industrial and residential growth in the Kelvin Grove zone. The recommendations will enable optimising of the investment in the new Railway Road bore by allowing for network peak demand to be supplied from storage and so enable the deferral of a new bore at Whakarongo for a few years until average daily demand requires. The recommendations will ensure Council continues to achieve 100% bacterial and protozoal compliance with the Drinking Water Standards and meets it legal obligations under the Health and Safety at Work Act.

 

 

 

Attachments

Nil   


 

 

 


PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

 

Committee Work Schedule

TO:                                Finance and Performance Committee

MEETING DATE:           17 September 2018

TITLE:                            Committee Work Schedule

 

 

RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Finance and Performance Committee

1.   That the Finance and Performance Committee receive its Work Schedule dated September 2018.

 

 

Attachments

1.

Committee Work Schedule

 

    


PDF Creator