AGENDA
Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
Rachel Bowen (Chairperson) |
|
Jim Jefferies (Deputy Chairperson) |
|
Grant Smith (The Mayor) |
|
Susan Baty |
Vaughan Dennison |
Brent Barrett |
Karen Naylor |
Adrian Broad |
Bruno Petrenas |
Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke |
Tangi Utikere |
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee MEETING
12 November 2018
Order of Business
NOTE: The Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting coincides with the ordinary meeting of the Economic Development Committee. The Committees will conduct business in the following order:
- Economic Development Committee
- Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
2. Notification of Additional Items
Pursuant to Sections 46A(7) and 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, to receive the Chairperson’s explanation that specified item(s), which do not appear on the Agenda of this meeting and/or the meeting to be held with the public excluded, will be discussed.
Any additions in accordance with Section 46A(7) must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting.
Any additions in accordance with Section 46A(7A) may be received or referred to a subsequent meeting for further discussion. No resolution, decision or recommendation can be made in respect of a minor item.
3. Declarations of Interest (if any)
Members are reminded of their duty to give a general notice of any interest of items to be considered on this agenda and the need to declare these interests.
To receive comments from members of the public on matters specified on this Agenda or, if time permits, on other Committee matters.
(NOTE: If the Committee wishes to consider or discuss any issue raised that is not specified on the Agenda, other than to receive the comment made or refer it to the Chief Executive, then a resolution will need to be made in accordance with clause 2 above.)
5. Presentation - Manawatu Art Trail Page 7
6. Presentation – CEDA’s Distinguished Alumni of the Manawatu Project Page 9
7. Deputation - Te Toa Manawatu Page 11
8. Confirmation of Minutes Page 13
“That the minutes of the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting of 10 September 2018 Part I Public be confirmed as a true and correct record.”
9. Toa o Manawatū - Council Update Page 21
Memorandum, dated 23 October 2018 presented by the General Manager - Community, Debbie Duncan.
10. Presentation of 2017-18 Annual Reports for Council-Controlled Organisations (Cultural) Page 25
Report, dated 24 October 2018 presented by the General Manager - Community, Debbie Duncan.
11. Council Arts Funding Page 221
Report, dated 24 October 2018 presented by the General Manager - Community, Debbie Duncan.
12. Proposed Process for s17A Stage 2 Review of the Arts and Culture Organisations Page 231
Memorandum, dated 19 October 2018 presented by the Head of Community Planning, Andrew Boyle.
13. Committee Work Schedule Page 235
14. Exclusion of Public
|
To be moved: “That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting listed in the table below. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public as stated in the above table. Also that the persons listed below be permitted to remain after the public has been excluded for the reasons stated. Chief Executive (Heather Shotter), Chief Financial Officer (Grant Elliott), Acting Chief Infrastructure Officer (Ray Swadel), Acting General Manager – Strategy and Planning (David Murphy), General Manager - Community (Debbie Duncan), Acting General Manager – Customer (Sheryl Bryant), Human Resources Manager (Wayne Wilson), General Manager - Marketing and Communications (Sacha Haskell), Acting Operations Manager (Ray McIndoe) because of their knowledge and ability to provide the meeting with advice on matters both from an organisation-wide context (being members of the Council’s Management Team) and also from their specific role within the Council. Legal Counsel (John Annabell), because of his knowledge and ability to provide the meeting with legal and procedural advice. Acting Governance and Support Team Leader (David Murphy) and Committee Administrators (Penny Odell, Rachel Corser and Courtney Kibby), because of their knowledge and ability to provide the meeting with procedural advice and record the proceedings of the meeting. [Add Council Officers], because of their knowledge and ability to assist the meeting in speaking to their report and answering questions, noting that such officer will be present at the meeting only for the item that relate to their respective report. [Add Third Parties], because of their knowledge and ability to assist the meeting in speaking to their report/s [or other matters as specified] and answering questions, noting that such person/s will be present at the meeting only for the items that relate to their respective report/s [or matters as specified].
|
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Presentation - Manawatu Art Trail
RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive the presentation for information.
|
Summary
Ms Gunhild Litwin will make a presentation to the Committee regarding the Manawatu Art Trail.
Nil
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Presentation – CEDA’s Distinguished Alumni of the Manawatu Project
RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive the presentation for information.
|
Summary
Ms Janelle Deuchrass will make a presentation regarding CEDA’s Alumni Project.
Nil
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Deputation - Te Toa Manawatu
RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive the deputation for information.
|
Summary
Mr Trevor Mills and Mr Timothy Wilson will make a Deputation regarding the bronze sculpture project Te Toa Manawatu.
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
Palmerston North City Council
Minutes of the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee Meeting Part I Public, held in the Council Chamber, First Floor, Civic Administration Building, 32 The Square, Palmerston North on 10 September 2018, commencing at 9.00am
Members Present: |
Councillor Rachel Bowen (in the Chair), The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Jim Jefferies, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas and Tangi Utikere. |
Non Members: |
Councillors Leonie Hapeta, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann and Aleisha Rutherford. |
Apologies: |
Councillor Lew Findlay (early departure). |
Councillor Lew Findlay was not present when the meeting resumed at 11.02am. He was present for clause 22.
Councillor Tangi Utikere left the meeting at 12.09pm during consideration of clause 25. He entered the meeting again at 12.44pm during consideration of clause 27. He was not present for clauses 25 and 26 inclusive.
Councillor Duncan McCann left the meeting at 1.38pm during consideration of clause 29. He was not present for clause 29.
22-18 |
Apologies |
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Aleisha Rutherford. The COMMITTEE RESOLVED 1. That the Committee receive the apologies. |
|
Clause 22-18 above was carried 16 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Susan Baty, Brent Barrett, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Lew Findlay QSM, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. |
The meeting adjourned at 9.01am
The meeting resumed at 11.02am
When the meeting resumed Councillor Lew Findlay was not present.
23-18 |
Public Comment Public comment was received from Ms Jean Kahui regarding the art gallery petition and her support for keeping Te Manawa and the Art Gallery together. |
|
Moved Aleisha Rutherford, seconded Leonie Hapeta. The COMMITTEE RESOLVED 1. That the public comment be received for information. |
|
Clause 23-18 above was carried 15 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. |
24-18 |
Presentation - National Young Performer Awards 2018
Ms Nikki Cunningham and Ms Maryanne Mechen made a presentation regarding the National Young Perfomer Awards. It was the 42nd year of the competition and the 5th year of being held in Palmerston North. Nominations for the awards were received through competitions held around New Zealand and it was quite a strict process. The economic impact of the event was able to be measured over the past two years via the Central Economic Development Agency survey. It had been confirmed by the Palmerston North City Council that a partnership agreement would be created supporting the awards and this was expected shortly. |
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Lorna Johnson. Elected Members queried the partnership agreement and requested further information be provided to Council, along with a report on the Events and Festivals Strategy. The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive the presentation for information. |
|
Moved Aleisha Rutherford, seconded Lorna Johnson. 2. That the Chief Executive be instructed to provide further information regarding the funding and timeframes for the partnership agreement between the National Young Performer Awards and Palmerston North City Council, to be reported to the September Council meeting. |
|
Moved Leonie Hapeta, seconded Grant Smith. 3. That the Chief Executive be instructed to report on the Events and Festivals Strategy at the November 2018 Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting. |
|
Clause 24-18 above was carried 15 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. |
25-18 |
Presentation - Update on Fringe Festival
Councillor Tangi Utikere left the meeting at 12.09pm
Ms Kate Louise Eliott made a presentation regarding the upcoming Fringe Festival. Over 70 events were involved from around the country, with two international events. The Festival programmes had been created and distributed and the focus was now on the awards and the opening event. The majority of the funding for the event had come from Palmerston North City Council.
Support from the events team at Council had been reduced which had caused some difficulties.
|
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Adrian Broad. Elected Members requested further information regarding the support being provided for the festival by the events team and they were interested to see the outcomes of the festival. The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive the presentation for information. |
|
Moved Aleisha Rutherford, seconded Leonie Hapeta. 2. That the Chief Executive be instructed to provide a report on the support the Palmerston North City Council events team is providing to the Fringe Festival, to be reported to the September 2018 Council meeting. |
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Lorna Johnson. 3. That the Chief Executive be instructed to provide a report on the outcomes of the Fringe Festival to the first Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting in 2019. |
|
Clause 25-18 above was carried 14 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas and Aleisha Rutherford. |
26-18 |
Confirmation of Minutes |
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Vaughan Dennison. The COMMITTEE RESOLVED 1. That the minutes of the extraordinary Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting of 25 June 2018 Part I Public be confirmed as a true and correct record. |
|
Clause 26-18 above was carried 14 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas and Aleisha Rutherford. |
27-18 |
Presentation of Finalised Statement of Intent 2018-2021 for Council-Controlled Organisations Report, dated 20 August 2018 presented by the Manager - Community Engagement, Ian Littleworth and the Chief Financial Officer, Grant Elliott. Elected Members queried the audit requirements for Caccia Birch and requested a report on the issue in relation to all Council Controlled Organisations. |
|
Moved Grant Smith, seconded Rachel Bowen. The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS 1. That the report dated 20 August 2018 and titled `Presentation of Finalised Statement of Intent 2018-2021 for Council-Controlled Organisations’ be accepted. 2. That the final Statement of Intent 2018-2021 submitted by Globe Theatre Trust Board be approved. 3. That the final Statement of Intent 2018-2021 submitted by Caccia Birch Trust Board be approved. 4. That the final Statement of Intent 2018-2021 submitted by Regent Theatre Trust be approved. 5. That the final Statement of Intent 2018-2021 submitted by Te Manawa Museums Trust Board be approved.
|
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Grant Smith. 6. That the Chief Executive be instructed to provide an issues and options report on the audit issues facing Palmerston North City Council Controlled Organisations. |
|
Clause 27-18 above was carried 15 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. |
28-18 |
Approval of Letters of Expectation for Council-Controlled Organisations Memorandum, dated 20 August 2018 presented by the Manager - Community Engagement, Ian Littleworth. |
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Leonie Hapeta. The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS 1. That the memorandum dated 20 August 2018 and titled `Approval of Letters of Expectation for Council-Controlled Organisation’ be accepted 2. That the Letters of Expectation for Globe Theatre Trust, Caccia Birch Trust, Regent Theatre Trust and Te Manawa Museums Trust be approved for distribution to these cultural Council-Controlled Organisations, subject to the following amendments: - That Council’s responsibility as building owner be reflected in each Letter of Expectation - That the heritage purpose of the Regent Theatre and Te Manawa be reflected in their Letters of Expectation. |
|
Moved Leonie Hapeta, seconded Karen Naylor. - Add `Joint Marketing of Cultural Council Controlled Organisations’ to point 3 `Working Together’ in the Letter of Expectation for all Council Controlled Organisations. |
|
Moved Jim Jefferies, seconded Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke. - That a redraft of the Letter of Expectations be made to reflect a partnership approach. |
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Jim Jefferies. - That the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee be authorised to make minor amendments to the Letters of Expectations for Council Controlled Organisations.
|
|
Clause 28-18 above was carried 15 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Duncan McCann, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. |
29-18 |
Committee Work Schedule
Councillor Duncan McCann left the meeting at 1.38pm
|
|
Moved Rachel Bowen, seconded Aleisha Rutherford. The COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive its Work Schedule dated September 2018. |
|
Clause 29.1 above was carried 14 votes to 0, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Vaughan Dennison, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. |
|
Moved Lorna Johnson, seconded Aleisha Rutherford. 2. That in relation to the report back on s17a reviews, cultural Council Controlled Organisations are to be reviewed at the same time and an interim report be presented to the November 2018 Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting. |
|
Clause 29.2 above was carried 13 votes to 1, the voting being as follows: For: The Mayor (Grant Smith) and Councillors Brent Barrett, Susan Baty, Rachel Bowen, Adrian Broad, Gabrielle Bundy-Cooke, Leonie Hapeta, Jim Jefferies, Lorna Johnson, Karen Naylor, Bruno Petrenas, Aleisha Rutherford and Tangi Utikere. Against: Councillor Vaughan Dennison. |
The meeting finished at 1.40pm
Confirmed 12 November 2018
Chairperson
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Toa o Manawatū - Council Update
DATE: 23 October 2018
PRESENTED BY: Debbie Duncan, General Manager - Community
APPROVED BY: Heather Shotter, Chief Executive
1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive the memorandum titled `Toa o Manawatū – Council Update’ dated 23 October 2018 for information. 2. That Council provide a letter of support for this project, to be signed by the Mayor. |
1. ISSUE
This memorandum supports the deputation made by Mr Tim Wilson and Mr Trevor Mills.
Mr Wilson and Mr Mills propose to create a unique memorial sculpture representing contemporary military service. They will be leading the project, with support and advice from Council Officers.
2. BACKGROUND
Mr Wilson and Mr Mills are veterans of the East Timor campaign, and Mr Mills continues to serve with the New Zealand Defence Force. Both are amateur artists and have exhibited at Square Edge and at Bowen House in Wellington.
Earlier this year Mr Wilson and Mr Mills met with Council Officers to discuss their application for 2018 Creative Communities (CCNZ) funding towards this sculpture project. The application demonstrated a well-conceived project, but sought funding at a level not provided by the Palmerston North Creative Communities funding scheme.
The sculpture is to commemorate all deployments from the Manawatū, for campaigns since 1974 (i.e. post-Vietnam), with a life-size and realistic bronze depiction of a serving soldier (tentatively titled Toa o Manawatū). The soldier will represent all of the armed services.
Since the initial meeting Officers have remained in close communication with Mr Wilson and Mr Mills as they have continued to work on securing support and funding for the project.
The project cost is approximately $72,000 for the production and delivery of the sculpture. There is no current funding, but applications have been submitted to the Earl Creativity Trust and to Creative New Zealand (notification for both funds is due in November).
Mr Wilson and Mr Mills have received support from 1RNZIR (Linton) and RNZRSA
3. NEXT STEPS
They now seek Council assistance with:
1. Letter of support from the Mayor to be included with funding applications;
2. Confirmation of the preferred location of along the shared path next to the Manawatū River between the He Ara Kotahi Bridge and Linton;
3. Liaison with Rangitāne over the proposed location;
4. Determination of appropriate timeframes and completion date;
5. Site preparation;
6. Council will take responsibility for the statue and the ongoing maintenance.
7. A funding contribution of up to $5,000 towards this project
The sculpture will need to meet building and resource consent and compliance obligations, with the cost to be met by the sculptors.
Officers are able to assist with site location and liaison with Rangitāne whilst funding for site preparation can be provided from within internal Council resources.
Funding of up to $5,000 can also be provided from within the current Arts Initiatives programme. Further funding requests may be made dependent on the result of ongoing fundraising efforts. No Council funding is allocated specifically for this project, nor can funding beyond the level of $5,000 be supported from existing resources.
The Sculpture Trust are aware of this initiative, but haven’t expressed any interest in supporting it as the project falls outside their CBD focus.
4. Compliance and administration
Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide? If Yes quote relevant clause(s) from Delegations Manual <Enter clause> |
No |
|
Are the decisions significant? |
No |
|
If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water? |
No |
|
Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan? |
No |
|
Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure? |
No |
|
Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions? |
No |
|
Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans? |
No |
|
The recommendations contribute to Goal 2: A Creative and Exciting City |
||
The recommendations contribute to the outcomes of the Creative and Liveable Strategy |
||
The recommendations contribute to the achievement of action/actions in the Arts Plan The action is: · Work collaboratively across the Manawatū region for arts related and celebratory activities, programmes, projects and events. · Create and foster new and existing pathways that nurture new, developing and emerging artist and art forms and promote opportunities for people to participate in arts and cultural experiences in Palmerston North. And from the Culture and Heritage Plan: · Facilitate and enable local history. · Work with others to celebrate and promote local history. |
||
Contribution to strategic direction |
Council assistance with this project will contribute to creating a new work of art for the public art collection. Developing artists will be supported to create the work. Links with the armed services based in the region will be strengthened and their history and connection to Palmerston North and the Manawatū celebrated. |
|
Nil
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Presentation of 2017-18 Annual Reports for Council-Controlled Organisations (Cultural)
DATE: 24 October 2018
PRESENTED BY: Debbie Duncan, General Manager - Community
APPROVED BY: Heather Shotter, Chief Executive
1. That the report `Presentation of the 2017-18 Annual Reports for the Council-Controlled Organisations (Cultural)’ dated 24 October 2018 be received. 2. That the 2017-18 annual reports submitted by Globe Theatre Trust Board, Te Manawa Museums Trust Board, Caccia Birch Trust Board and Regent Theatre Trust Board be received. 3. That Council notes the performance achieved by each of the four cultural CCOs. 4. That Council thanks the board members, staff and volunteers of the cultural CCOs for their contributions and commitment during the 2017-18 year.
|
1. Overview of the problem or opportunity
1.1 The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) governs the relationship between Council and its Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs). Palmerston North City Council has four cultural CCOs: Caccia Birch Trust Board, Globe Theatre Trust Board, Regent Theatre Trust and Te Manawa Museums Trust.
1.2 Council is required to monitor the performance of the cultural CCOs to evaluate the contribution of each CCO to the achievement of:
· the Council’s objectives for the CCO;
· the desired results set out in the SOI; and
· the overall aims and outcomes of the Council.
1.3 CCO Trust Boards are invited to present their annual reports to the Council, and to speak to them. Council now has the opportunity to consider and comment on the annual reports for the 2017-18 year. At this stage the CCOs are reporting against their final SOIs for 2017-20. Council approved those SOIs in September 2017.
1.4 Each
of the annual reports were considered by the management team and Board of each
CCO. The final annual reports are subject to Board and auditor sign-off
prior to submission to the Council.
A CCO annual report must include:
· any information required by the SOI;
· audited consolidated financial statements for that financial year;
· an auditor’s report on the financial statements and the performance targets and other measures by which performance was judged; and
· information that is necessary to enable an informed assessment of the operations, including:
o comparison of the CCO’s performance with the SOI; and
o an explanation of any “material variances” between performance and the SOI.
2. Background and previous council decisions
2.1 Previous Council Decisions
2.1.1 Council approved the final CCO Statements of Intent for 2017-20 in September 2017.
2.1.2 The CCOs presented their six-month reports against these SOIs to Council in April 2018.
2.2 Officers have summarised the 2017-18 annual reports received from each cultural CCO in the following pages. The full annual reports for each CCO are appended to this report.
2.3 This report follows the format introduced with the presentation of the six monthly reports in April 2018. The narrative summaries are now accompanied by performance target and financial dashboards using the same KPIs as presented with the six month reports.
3. Globe Theatre Trust Board
3.1 Annual Report to 30 June 2018
GLOBE: SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES – ANNUAL |
In July 2017 the Board emerged from a restructure process and with a new staff team focused on community outreach, stakeholder engagement and growing communications. The result of this work is demonstrated by a significant increase in usage figures and performance nights, and community use at 83% of total usage. Work continues of the Theatre’s redevelopment plans with improved access to Globe 1, roof leaks repaired, sound system in Globe 1 has been revamped, and a second projector was purchased. The opening of the café provides a fabulous asset to the theatre operations, which have been extended to now a ticket sales facility. COGS funding enabled a programme of initiatives to seek hirer and patron feedback into the Board’s review of its strategic plan. In future, the Globe will be able to use this information to clearly track and build on its objectives. |
GLOBE: PERFORMANCE TARGET DASHBOARD – ANNUAL |
|||||
The 3 Year Trend = à Steady ä Improving æ Declining |
|||||
Measure |
|
YTD 30 Jun 2017 |
YTD 3 Jun 2018 |
3 Year Trend |
Comments on trend |
Community usage |
Actual Target |
75% 60% |
83% 60% |
ä |
High figure in 2015/16 results trending up again |
Usage nights |
Actual Target |
273 250 |
514 250 |
ä |
Steady increase year-on-year |
Performance nights |
Actual Target |
138 165 |
175 165 |
ä |
High figure in 2015/16 results trending up again |
Events co-promoted by Trust |
Actual Target |
7 2 (full year) |
29 2 (full year) |
ä |
Steady increase year-on-year |
Hirers |
Actual Target |
70 None set |
87 None set |
ä |
Steady increase (no 2015 data) |
New hirers |
Actual Target |
28 None set |
45 None set |
ä |
Steady increase (no 2015 data) |
GLOBE: FINANCIALS – ANNUAL |
2017/18 |
2017/18 |
|
2016/17 |
Actual 2016/17-2017/18 |
|
Summary Financials ($000) |
Actual |
Budget |
Var. |
Actual |
Var. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
PNCC grant |
77 |
77 |
|
75 |
2 |
Total Revenue |
182 |
276 |
(94) |
176 |
6 |
Total Expenses |
210 |
202 |
(7) |
177 |
(32) |
Net Surplus (Deficit)* |
(28) |
74 |
(102) |
(2) |
(26) |
|
|
|
|||
Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
43 |
37 |
6 |
48 |
(5) |
Total Assets |
271 |
403 |
(132) |
295 |
(24) |
Current Liabilities |
43 |
15 |
(28) |
39 |
(4) |
Total Liabilities |
43 |
15 |
(28) |
39 |
(4) |
Equity |
228 |
388 |
(160) |
226 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Cash Flows |
1 |
1 |
|
14 |
(13) |
Opening Cash |
32 |
25 |
7 |
18 |
14 |
Closing Cash |
33 |
25 |
8 |
32 |
1 |
· Operating revenue was 94k less than budget, due to delay in lighting upgrade, leading to an overall unfavourable financial performance against budget. |
|||||
· Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) reduced by $9k to zero. |
|||||
· The 2-year cumulative cash increase was $15k. |
GLOBE: ISSUES & OUTLOOK – ANNUAL |
An increased operating grant is provided from 2018/19 to support the ongoing renewals programme. Progress has been made to address rigging issues in Globe 1 as part of looking at the structural integrity of Globe 1. It is anticipated that Globe 1 will be closed in January 2019 to allow this work to happen. Other building work in 2018/19 will include the installation of air conditioning in Globe 1. Work is ongoing in growing the outreach programme with the community to build theatre usage. |
4. Te Manawa Museums Trust
4.1 Annual Report to 30 June 2018
TE MANAWA: SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES – ANNUAL |
A strong exhibitions programme has continued through the year with The Topp Twins – an Exhibition for New Zealand being added to the touring ensemble. The communications campaign around this particular exhibition saw Te Manawa recognised as a finalist in the International Design Communications Awards. The flagship science exhibition Sunlight – Ihi Kōmaru continues to delight audiences in Auckland and Christchurch. Te Manawa presented a range of events and exhibitions, resulting in a strong performance against its visitor targets. A number of significant collections have been donated to Te Manawa to care for on behalf of the city. Of significance is two works by photographer Dr Fiona Pardington, a superb Kahu poni cloak, two pouwhenua by Matt Pine and a large urn by Paul Maseyk. The permanent collection increased to 49,181 items. Review of partnership agreement with Rangitāne was completed and document signed in September 2017. Review of other strategic partnerships was completed in June 2018. |
TE MANAWA: PERFORMANCE TARGET DASHBOARD – ANNUAL |
|||||
The 3 Year Trend = à Steady ä Improving æ Declining |
|||||
Measure |
|
YTD 30 Jun 2017 |
YTD 30 Jun 2018 |
3 Year Trend |
Comments on trend |
Visits to TM incl e-visits |
Actual Target |
175,853 170,000 |
192,592 172,000 |
ä |
Return to an upward trend again after high High YTD 2016 result) |
Visits to exhibitions at other venues |
Actual Target |
75,240 100,000 |
251,141 100,000 |
ä |
Not achieved in 2016/17 but upward trend for 17/18 |
Online reach |
Actual Target |
581,129 160,000 |
524,746 160,000 |
æ |
Downward trend but still above target |
Third-party revenue |
Actual Target |
$972,000 $546,000 |
$660,000 $577,000 |
æ |
High YTD 2016 result (due to Dinos) then downward trend. Still above target |
Visitor satisfaction (TM surveys) |
Actual Target |
96% >96% |
99% >96% |
ä |
Steady increase year-on-year |
Activity participation |
Actual Target |
23,676 20,000 |
18,700 21,000 |
æ |
Decline in actuals from 2016/17. Below target for 2017/18 |
TE MANAWA: FINANCIALS – ANNUAL |
|
2017/18 |
2017/18 |
Budget |
2016/17 |
Actual 2016/17-2017/18 |
Summary Financials ($000) |
Actual |
Budget |
Var. |
Actual |
Var. |
|
|
|
|||
Financial Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
PNCC grant |
3,064 |
3,046 |
18 |
3,004 |
60 |
Total Operating Revenue |
3,723 |
3,623 |
100 |
3,975 |
(252) |
Total Operating Expenses |
3,930 |
3,651 |
(279) |
4,034 |
103 |
Net Operating Surplus (Deficit) |
(207) |
(28) |
(179) |
(58) |
(149) |
|
|
|
|||
Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
949 |
1,130 |
(181) |
1,068 |
(118) |
Total Assets |
18,419 |
16,844 |
1,575 |
16,787 |
1,664 |
Current Liabilities |
521 |
425 |
(97) |
413 |
(109) |
Total Liabilities |
525 |
428 |
(97) |
417 |
(107) |
Equity |
17,895 |
16,416 |
1,479 |
16,370 |
1,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Cash Flows |
(238) |
184 |
(422) |
(216) |
(21) |
Opening Cash |
591 |
660 |
(69) |
808 |
(216) |
Closing Cash |
354 |
845 |
(491) |
591 |
(238) |
· Financial performance was unfavourable against budget. |
· Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) decreased by $227k, despite budgeting for an increase. |
· Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $238k in the year, and the 2-year cumulative cash reduction is $454k. |
TE MANAWA: ISSUES & OUTLOOK – ANNUAL |
Shaping the long-term future of Te Manawa is a high priority for the Trust, and some planned activities have been deferred for consideration as part of TM2025. Work continues on the Rangitāne Cultural Centre concept – Te Ahikaea The art gallery will be reopened after maintenance work is completed. This will provide the ability to show more of the collection in the form of long term installations. Reaching LEOTC (Learning Experiences Outside the Classroom) targets continues to be a challenge. From 1 January 2018 this programme is covered by new contract arrangements, including a lower visit target. Work will continue in growing community relationships and translating those into exhibitions, programmes and activities that met the needs of the local community. |
5. Caccia Birch Trust Board.
5.1 Annual Report to 30 June 2018
CACCIA BIRCH: SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES – ANNUAL |
Caccia Birch Trust Board continued to encourage access to the property which has seen an increase in occupancy and usage day with total attendees to the House of 11,349. Review of the Trust Board’s strategic plan was completed in December 2017. The Trust has secured funding for th first part of the new display in the CoachHouse Archive. The Trust Board continues to manage the maintenance of the house and grounds to ensure that this heritage property is preserved for coming generations. The house is in excellent condition and the Board continues to plan for improvements, such as a new recycling facility and landscaping. |
CACCIA BIRCH: PERFORMANCE TARGET DASHBOARD – ANNUAL |
|||||
The 3 Year Trend = à Steady ä Improving æ Declining |
|||||
Measure |
|
YTD 30 Jun 2017 |
YTD 30 Jun 2018 |
3 Year Trend |
Comments on trend |
Open afternoons |
Actual Target |
20 10 (full year) |
15 10 (full year) |
æ |
Downwards trend |
Average occupancy |
Actual Target |
63% None set |
73% None set |
ä |
Steady upwards trend |
Usage days |
Actual Target |
230 None set |
267 None set |
ä |
Steady upwards trend |
Proportion of usage: Training and seminars |
Actual Target |
45% None set |
46% None set |
ä |
Slight upwards trend |
Proportion of usage: Meetings |
Actual Target |
38% None set |
3o% None set |
æ |
Downwards trend |
Proportion of usage: Community discounted |
Actual Target |
N/A None set |
6% None set |
|
No 3 year trend available |
Proportion of usage: Private functions and weddings |
Actual Target |
12% None set |
10% None set |
æ |
Slight downwards trend |
Proportion of usage: Events, tours and open days |
Actual Target |
5% None set |
8% None set |
ä |
Slight upwards trend |
CACCIA BIRCH: FINANCIALS – ANNUAL |
2017/18 |
2017/18 |
Budget |
2016/17 |
Actual 2016/17-2017/18 |
|
Summary Financials ($000) |
Actual |
Budget |
Var. |
Actual |
Var. |
|
|
|
|||
Financial Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
PNCC grant |
98 |
101 |
(3) |
104 |
(6) |
Total Revenue |
288 |
286 |
3 |
266 |
22 |
Total Expenses |
294 |
307 |
13 |
287 |
(7) |
Net Surplus (Deficit) |
(6) |
(21) |
15 |
(21) |
15 |
|
|
|
|||
Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
81 |
66 |
16 |
17 |
65 |
Total Assets |
189 |
173 |
16 |
182 |
6 |
Current Liabilities |
50 |
26 |
(24) |
37 |
(13) |
Total Liabilities |
50 |
26 |
(24) |
37 |
(13) |
Equity |
139 |
148 |
(9) |
145 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Cash Flows |
22 |
10 |
12 |
(2) |
24 |
Opening Cash |
20 |
28 |
(8) |
22 |
(2) |
Closing Cash |
42 |
38 |
4 |
20 |
22 |
· Caccia Birch’s financial performance was favourable against budget, with favourable outcomes against both revenue and expenses. |
|||||
· Working capital (Current assets minus current liabilities) increased by $52k from a negative position to +$31k. |
|||||
· Cash and cash equivalents increased by $22k in the year. |
CACCIA BIRCH: ISSUES & OUTLOOK – ANNUAL |
There continues to be questions over whether audit fees can be applied or not to Caccia Birch. The Board is currently working on a robust Bequest Strategy to include in their Governance Manual Council’s plans for the development of the lagoon reserve frontage have been put on hold until 2018/19. The Board are very keen to continue to work with Council on those design plans and to link in their own grounds plans. Plans for a recycling facility have been created and have been submitted to Heritage NZ for approval. The Trust hopes to attract greater visitor participation by developing the grounds and Coach House Archive. Funding has been secured to continue work on the archive project. |
6. Regent Theatre Trust
6.1 Annual Report to 30 June 2018
REGENT: SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES – ANNUAL |
|||||
The Regent Theatre has hosted a range user groups over this reporting period. Community use sits at 75%, and the Board is committed to maintaining accessibility and providing support for community hirers. This is the first annual report presented under the new Board Chair, David Lea. A focus for this year has been on ensuring planning and policies are current including the writing of a new strategic plan. More recently the focus has shifted to developing a marketing strategy. This year marked a milestone for the Trust – in May 2018 it will be 20 years since the refurbishment and reopening of the Regent on Broadway. This was celebrated with 4 productions. The Friends of the Regent continue to be a valued part of theatre operations. This year they organised donations of over $100,000 towards equipment including the replacement of the Regent’s dimmer system and the stage lighting console.
|
|||||
REGENT: PERFORMANCE TARGET DASHBOARD – ANNUAL |
|||||
The 3 Year Trend = à Steady ä Improving æ Declining |
|||||
Measure |
|
YTD 30 Jun 2017 |
YTD 30 Jun 2018 |
3 Year Trend |
Comments on trend |
Total days use (auditorium) |
Actual Target |
213 80 |
158 None set |
æ |
Downwards trend after rise in 2016/17 |
Total days hire: commercial |
Actual Target |
53 None set |
36 None set |
æ |
Slight downwards trend after rise in 2016/17 |
Total days hire: community |
Actual Target |
160 None set |
122 None set |
æ |
Slight downwards trend after rise in 2016/17 |
Total attendances |
Actual Target |
100,576 100, 000 |
91,065 100,000 |
æ |
Slight downwards trend after rise in 2016/17 |
Events in Regency and Rehearsal Rooms |
Actual Target |
223 - |
218 135 |
æ |
Slight downwards trend but above target |
Events hosted with youth organisation |
Actual Target |
- |
1 1 (full year) |
– |
New measure for 2017/18 |
REGENT: FINANCIALS – ANNUAL |
2017/18 |
2017/18 |
Budget |
2016/17 |
Actual 2016/17-2017/18 |
|
Summary Financials ($000) |
Actual |
Budget |
Var. |
Actual |
Var. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
PNCC grant |
220 |
219 |
1 |
216 |
4 |
Total Revenue |
1035 |
884 |
151 |
1045 |
(10) |
Total Expenses |
1000 |
960 |
(40) |
968 |
(32) |
Net Surplus (Deficit) |
35 |
(76) |
111 |
77 |
(42) |
|
|
|
|||
Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
452 |
- |
- |
413 |
39 |
Total Assets |
805 |
- |
- |
700 |
105 |
Current Liabilities |
204 |
- |
- |
135 |
(70) |
Total Liabilities |
204 |
- |
- |
135 |
(70) |
Equity |
601 |
- |
- |
566 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows |
|
|
|
||
Total Net Cash Flows |
11 |
- |
- |
(53) |
64 |
Opening Cash |
104 |
- |
- |
157 |
(53) |
Closing Cash |
115 |
- |
- |
104 |
11 |
Note that Regent Theatre has not previously provided a budget for Financial Position and Cash Flows. This has been requested to be included in future budgets |
|||||
· The financial performance was favourable against budget. |
|||||
· Working capital (Current assets minus current liabilities) decreased by $31k in the year. |
|||||
· Cash and cash equivalents increased by $11k in the year. |
REGENT: ISSUES & OUTLOOK – ANNUAL |
The absence of an Abbey Musical Theatre production during the reporting period has led to a reduction in patronage and live nights. However, an agreement has been reached with Abbey which will ensure one production per year for the next five years. Palmerston North has been confirmed as the home of the National Young Performer Awards (PACANZ) which will be based principally at the Regent. The Regent is developing a mid-winter series of events, to be expanded further in 2019. Bookings from local community groups continue to grow |
7. Next actions
7.1 Officers will continue to work with CCOs to communicate Council’s new strategic direction, and to help the CCOs align their vision.
7.2 The
Chair of each CCO was formally notified in January 2018 that a Letter of
Expectation process is to be introduced later this year. Letters of Expectation
ensure Council’s expectations and priorities are clearly communicated to
each CCO, giving them guidance in respect of the matters to be covered by their
next SOI.
These were approved by Council in August 2018 subject to some minor additions
and to reframe the content to take a more partnership focus. These letters are
currently been finalised with the relevant Boards.
7.3 At the end of February 2019 the CCOs will submit:
· their draft SOIs for 2019–2022; and
· six-month reports on the current SOI (2018–2021).
These will be brought to the Committee in due course.
8. Outline of community engagement process
The Community Funding Coordinator and the Arts Coordinator hold monthly meetings with the managers of the cultural CCOs. These meetings give the attendees a chance to share information and identify opportunities for collaboration. One outcome has been increased communication between the cultural CCOs and other Council-funded arts organisations.
Compliance and administration
Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide? If Yes quote relevant clause(s) from Delegations Manual <Enter clause> |
No |
Are the decisions significant? |
No |
If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water? |
No |
Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan? |
No |
Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure? |
No |
Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions? |
Yes |
Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans? |
No |
1. |
Globe Theatre Trust Annual Report ⇩ |
|
2. |
Te Manawa Museums Trust Annual Report ⇩ |
|
3. |
Caccia Birch Trust Annual Report ⇩ |
|
4. |
Regent Theatre Trust Annual Report ⇩ |
|
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Council Arts Funding
DATE: 24 October 2018
PRESENTED BY: Debbie Duncan, General Manager - Community
APPROVED BY: Heather Shotter, Chief Executive
1. That the report titled `Council Arts Funding’ dated 24 October 2018 be received. 2. That consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to supporting the creation of a separate arts fund of $50,000 to be available for more significant activities that will reinforce economic growth or require a higher level of funding. 3. That the Chief Executive be instructed to explore potential collaborative opportunities with external funding providers to increase the level of funding available to the arts sector.
|
Summary of options analysis for
Problem or Opportunity |
To provide for Council consideration, options that address concerns raised over the current level of funding available to the arts sector |
|
OPTION 1: |
Consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to increasing the level of council’s contribution to the Creative Communities Scheme to match the level of CCNZ funding |
|
Community Views |
Not sought but the CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee is seeing a sustained level of community funding applications being made in excess of available funds |
|
Benefits |
Provides additional funding to help meet the level of applications that are been made to the CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee |
|
Risks |
Whilst this will assist in addressing the imbalance between funding available and the level of applications being made, it will not fully meet the needs of the community |
|
Financial |
Additional funding in the region of $30,000 to $40,000 to be requested through the next Annual Plan |
|
OPTION 2: |
Consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to supporting the creation of a separate arts fund of $50,000 to be available for more significant activities that will reinforce economic growth or require a higher level of funding |
|
Community Views |
Not sought but the CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee is seeing a sustained level of community funding applications being made in excess of available funds |
|
Benefits |
Provides the ability to be proactive in growing opportunities to enhance the city as an arts powerhouse |
|
Risks |
The demand for this sort of fund has not been fully tested |
|
Financial |
$50,000 additional funding to be requested through the next Annual Plan |
|
OPTION 3: |
Officers be instructed to explore potential collaborative opportunities with external funding providers to increase the level of funding available to the arts sector |
|
Community Views |
Not sought |
|
Benefits |
A Council/External funder’s collaboration could provide a greater level of funding availability which will have a positive flow on effect on arts activities being provided in the city |
|
Risks |
There may not be a suitable level of interest from funding providers and/or it may also potentially dilute available funding pools for other activities, however this would need to be evaluated |
|
Financial |
Unknown at this point |
|
OPTION 4: |
Council arts funding remains at current levels |
|
Community Views |
Not specifically sought on this issue |
|
Benefits |
Level of arts funding remains the same as agreed through the 10 Year Plan |
|
Risks |
The imbalance between the level of funding applications being made and funding available remains which means some activities can’t be undertaken. This may or may not have a flow on effect on the city growing a reputation as an arts powerhouse. |
|
Financial |
No change |
|
The recommendations contribute to Goal 2: A Creative and Exciting City |
||
The recommended option contributes to the outcomes of the Creative and Liveable Strategy |
||
The recommended option contributes to the achievement of action/actions in the Arts Plan The action is: Create and foster existing and new pathways that nurture new, developing and emerging artists and art forms and provide opportunities for people to participate in arts and cultural experiences in Palmerston North. Work collaboratively across the Manawatu region for arts related and celebratory activities, programmes, projects and events. |
||
Contribution to strategic direction |
Increased arts funding would better enable the sector to contribute to the city’s ambition to be grow our reputation as an arts powerhouse. |
|
Rationale for the recommendations
1. Overview of the problem or opportunity
1.1 The
CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee has requested that a report be provided
to the Arts, Culture & Heritage Committee relaying a number of issues that
arose during the September 2018 meeting regarding the current level of arts
funding and how this relates to the city’s ambition to grow our
reputation as an arts powerhouse.
In particular:
The level of Creative Communities Scheme funding that is applied for annually
far exceeds the funding that is available to be distributed.
There is no funding pool readily available for more significant arts requests
i.e. CCNZ funding applications that fall in the $10,000 - $20,000 range.
There is no funding to support or to encourage more age-grade artistic competitions to the city in a similar vein to the Sports Events Partnership Fund which is currently managed by Sports Manawatu.
All funding is
currently administered in accordance with CCNZ’s funding criteria,
limiting the ability to target funding towards a particular theme or for
specific purposes and priorities that may sit outside CCNZ criteria.
Opportunities may exist to work collaboratively with external funders to
increase the level of arts funding available.
2. Background and previous council decisions
2.1 At
the Extraordinary CCNZ/Arts &Culture Fund Committee meeting held on 20
September 2018 it was resolved:
That Committee requests the Chief Executive provide a report on funding
issues and options on the Creative Community Scheme to the Arts, Culture and
Heritage Committee.
2.2 A
key concern raised at the CCNZ/Arts Committee meeting was regarding the ongoing
level of over subscription for the Creative Communities Scheme. The tables
below reflect that imbalance with levels of applications and
funding.
2.3 Council
does already provide a range of funding opportunities that are accessible, to
varying degrees, to the arts sector:
Creative Communities Scheme (CCNZ)
The scheme encourages local communities to create and present opportunities to
participate in arts activities.
Celebrating Communities Grant
This grant provides support to events in Palmerston North that help particular
communities to celebrate their strengths and share them with the city. These
events may include those with an arts focus.
Strategic Priority Grants
These multi-year grants activate the potential of the community sector
(including arts) to deliver on Council’s strategic direction by
supporting projects, activities or services that contribute to Council
priorities.
Community Development Small Grants
These grants provide funding for essential administration expenses to enable
not-for-profit community groups to operate. Through the 2018 Community Funding
Policy the eligibility criteria was expanded to include arts organisations.
Training Fund
This fund exists to provide training for community groups (including arts
groups) to build capacity and capability based on a needs analysis.
Local Initiative Fund
This fund provides an opportunity for new unique and innovative initiatives to
develop which address an issue of community concern in the city. Whilst the
fund is open to the whole community the focus is on contributing to priorities
outlined in the Connected Community Strategy.
Major Events Fund
This fund is available to any arts group or organisation that is able to meet
the relevant criteria.
3. Description of options
3.1 In order to increase the level of funding that is available for the arts sector the following options are suggested for Council consideration:
3.2 That consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to increasing the level of council’s contribution to the Creative Communities Scheme to match the level of CCNZ funding.
3.3 That consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to supporting the creation of a separate arts fund available for more significant activities that will reinforce economic growth or require a higher level of funding.
3.4 That Officers be instructed to explore potential collaborative opportunities with external funding providers to increase the level of funding available to the arts sector
3.5 That Council arts funding remains at current levels.
4. Analysis of options
4.1 OPTION: That consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to increasing the level of council’s contribution to the Creative Communities Scheme to match the level of CCNZ funding.
The Creative Communities Scheme is a partnership between Creative New Zealand and local authorities including this Council. The purpose of the scheme is to encourage local communities to create and present opportunities to participate in arts activities. Funding criteria is set by CCNZ and agreed through the formal partnership agreement.
Total funding in the scheme for 2018/19 is $94,477 with CCNZ contributing $62,000 and Council $32,000. CCNZ funding is provide on a per capita basis and potentially may increase when the latest Census figures are released.
In order for Council to increase the level of their funding to match that of CCNZ it would likely require an additional annual contribution in the region of $30,000 -$40,000. The level of additional financial contribution required will be clearer once CCNZ have confirmed their own contribution after the release of the latest census figures.
On average across the last four years the funds allocated through the scheme has represented 38% of the funding amount actually requested. An increase to Council funding to match the CCNZ contribution would push the four yearly average of funds allocated / funds requested to around 50%.
Council already has one of the highest levels of Council funding contributions to this scheme. Any additional level of funding would further increase this. This can be viewed as a point of difference nationally and an example of Council taking a lead in supporting the arts and the vision of an arts powerhouse. Alternatively this could be viewed as Council being out of step with other local authorities.
In relation to the comment regarding the ability to target funds to specific priorities, it should be noted that this can be achieved within this scheme as long those priorities still fit with the purpose of the scheme and CCNZ’s funding criteria.
This option is not supported by Officers as there is likely to be additional funding contributed to this scheme from CCNZ which will help address the imbalance between applications and funds allocated. The option below would also take the pressure off the larger funding requests coming to this scheme allowing more funding to be available for the majority of applications.
4.2 OPTION: That consideration is given through the next Annual Plan process to supporting the creation of a separate arts fund of $50,000 to be available for more significant activities that will reinforce economic growth or require a higher level of funding
The CCNZ fund is
focused on smaller scale arts projects with a four year average of $2,365 per
application being allocated. The raises the question of how arts activities
that potentially would require a higher level of funding are supported.
In the first round of 2018/19 Creative Communities Scheme 23% of applications
were for more than $5,000 with the highest being $20,000. Whilst some of these
were able to be supported to some extent the reality is that by supporting a
few larger requests, it limits the ability of the committee to support
the far greater number of smaller funding requests.
The Sports Events Partnership Fund administered by Sports Manawatu is an
excellent example of what can be achieved by having a fund that provides
assistance to groups who are planning activities that will reinforce economic
growth. This particular fund plays an important role in supporting sporting
events in the city that contribute significant economic benefit.
A comparable fund that enables similar opportunities to be explored in
supporting new arts initiatives and/or attracting arts related age grade
competitions, tournaments and events to the city could equally add economic
benefit to the city.
Given this fund would be a Council one it would mean that Council would retain
a greater ability to set priorities for this fund.
This option proposes that a fund of $50,000 be established to support both the
more sizable arts requests; and builds on the potential that may be derived
from arts activities to the city in the vein of the Sports Events Partnership
Fund.
The figure of $50,000 is proposed on the basis that it is a similar amount to
what would be required to match fund in the first option. No wider analysis has
been undertaken at this stage, but could be considered if required as part of
the annual plan considerations.
4.3 OPTION: That Officers be instructed to explore potential collaborative opportunities with external funding providers to increase the level of funding available to the arts sector
Anecdotally it has
been identified that opportunities may exist to collaborate with existing
external funding providers to increase the level of funding accessible to the
arts sector.
This has not been explored in any depth beyond very initial conversations.
It is recommended that Officers be asked to progress conversations with
external funders to test the viability of this option. Any potential
opportunities that arise can be factored into Council consideration of other
art funding options during the Annual Plan process.
4.4 OPTION: That Council arts funding remains at current levels
Current funding levels have already been considered as part of the recent 10 Year Plan process, consequently any change of funding will be in addition to those decisions.
5. Conclusion
5.1 The CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee has identified a number of issues with the current level of arts funding and the imbalance with the level of applications being received.
5.2 Council has an opportunity to consider its response to this in light of the city’s ambition to be grow our reputation as an arts powerhouse.
6. Next actions
6.1 If the recommendations are approved then Officers can commence progressing the associated actions
7. Outline of community engagement process
7.1 Apart from discussion at the CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee there has been no community consultation on this matter.
7.2 The CCNZ/Arts & Culture Fund Committee does include a number of community representatives.
Compliance and administration
Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide? If Yes quote relevant clause(s) from Delegations Manual <Enter clause> |
No |
Are the decisions significant? |
No |
If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water? |
No |
Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan? |
No |
Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure? |
No |
Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions? |
No |
Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans? |
No |
Nil
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Proposed Process for s17A Stage 2 Review of the Arts and Culture Organisations
DATE: 19 October 2018
Presented By: Andrew Boyle, Head of Community Planning, Strategy and Planning
APPROVED BY: David Murphy, Acting General Manager - Strategy and Planning
1. ISSUE
To get Committee feedback on the proposed process for the Stage 2 s17A reviews of the arts and culture organisations. The memo is a result of an instruction from the September 2018 Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee meeting, requesting an interim report outlining the proposed process for the review.
2. BACKGROUND
All Councils have to carry out cost effectiveness reviews of how their services are governed, funded and delivered. These are called Section 17A reviews. The Council carried out the first round of reviews in 2017. At the end of this it decided to a more detailed stage 2 review of the arts and cultural organisations was warranted.
The arts and cultural organisations are Te Manawa, the Regent, the Globe, Caccia Birch, Square Edge and Creative Sounds.
Te Manawa, the Regent, the Globe, and Caccia Birch are Council Controlled Organisation (CCOs). Square Edge and Creative Sounds are organisations funded through Council’s Fees for Service arrangements. In all cases the Council is the main funder of these organisations and provides the buildings they operate in.
3. DISCUSSION
Purpose: The main purpose of the review will be to look at how the arts and cultural organisations can most cost effectively contribute to Council’s strategic direction. (Note: the stage 1 s17A review was carried out under the Council’s 2015 strategic direction. The 2018 strategic direction puts more emphasis on arts and culture.)
The review will also consider the community petition asking Council “to remove the Art Gallery from the control of Te Manawa Museums Trust and to appoint a new Trust Board to take care of the Art Gallery and look after the valuable art collections inside”.
It will also look at the following issues raised by Council through the stage 1 review:
· better retention and recognition of the contribution of volunteers (in terms of their time and contribution to the development of the collections);
· achieving greater efficiencies through shared back of house activities such as human resourcing, marketing and promotions, IT and ticketing;
· and, if CCOs and Boards are retained, futureproofing the CCOs so new responsibilities can be added, and putting more emphasis on Board succession training.
Options: s17A reviews must consider the following:
· governance and funding by the Council, or by a shared governance arrangement;
· service delivery by the Council, by a CCO, by another Council, or by another organisation.
These were looked at in the stage 1 review and will be considered in more detail through the stage 2 review. Hence the main options are:
· keep the status quo
· set up new CCO(s)
· governance and delivery by the Council.
The final outcome could be a mix of the above options.
Methodology:
The review will involve three main steps.
1. Gather information from key stakeholders, including the organisations and associated Trusts, Council, Rangitāne, and key user groups. These discussions would focus on:
· how cost-effectively the organisations are achieving their purposes (as stated in the Statements of Intent, Letters of Expectation and funding agreements);
· what, if any, changes would make them more cost-effective;
· what are the advantages and disadvantages of the three options.
2. Evaluate the three options for each organisation through a detailed look using criteria developed from a literature review of the advantages and disadvantages of CCO or inhouse governance and service delivery. These include things like contribution to Council strategies, public accountability, integration with Council services, external fund-raising opportunities, commercial opportunities, the ability to spread risk, economies of scale, and the need for specialist governance or delivery skills.
3. Evaluate the financial implications of the options, including the impact on overheads and possible efficiencies through sharing back of house activities.
Timeframe:
The review should be completed by mid-2019, with options being presented to Council for consideration.
Other issues:
The review is not about the levels of service provided by the organisations, nor is it about the amount of funding provided by Council. These are set through Council’s 10 Year Plan and the Statement of Intent / funding agreements.
4. NEXT STEPS
Officers will carry out the review and report to Council.
5. Compliance and administration
Does the Committee have delegated authority to decide? |
Yes |
|
Are the decisions significant? |
No |
|
If they are significant do they affect land or a body of water? |
No |
|
Can this decision only be made through a 10 Year Plan? |
No |
|
Does this decision require consultation through the Special Consultative procedure? |
No |
|
Is there funding in the current Annual Plan for these actions? |
Yes |
|
Are the recommendations inconsistent with any of Council’s policies or plans? |
No |
|
The recommendations contribute to Goal 2: A Creative and Exciting City
|
||
The recommendations contribute to the outcomes of the Creative and Liveable Strategy |
||
The recommendations contribute in general to the achievement of the: · Arts Plan · City Centre Plan · Cultural and Heritage Plan · Events and Festivals Plan · Heritage Management Plan · Urban Design Plan |
||
Contribution to strategic direction |
This is by ensuring that the arts and cultural organisations can most cost effectively contribute to Council’s strategic direction.
|
|
PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
TO: Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee
MEETING DATE: 12 November 2018
TITLE: Committee Work Schedule
RECOMMENDATION(S) TO Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee 1. That the Arts, Culture and Heritage Committee receive its Work Schedule dated November 2018.
|
1. |
Committee Work Schedule ⇩ |
|